View our webinar on "PTAB Trials by the Numbers"

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

View our webinar on "PTAB Trials by the Numbers"

Our next Managing IP webinar is taking place on Tuesday June 14 and is titled “PTAB Trials by the Numbers”. Partners from Fitzpatrick Cella Harper & Scinto will provide a statistical analysis of inter partes review and covered business method trials at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board

*UPDATE: The webinar has now taken place. View a replay here or below*   

Join me for our next webinar, “PTAB Trials by the Numbers”.

The webinar takes place on Tuesday June 14 at 11am (New York), 8am (West Coast), 4pm (London).

Presenters:

Justin Oliver and Jonathan Berschadsky – partners at Fitzpatrick Cella Harper & Scinto,

Moderator:

Michael Loney – Americas editor at Managing IP

The webinar will feature a statistical analysis of inter partes review (IPR) and covered business method (CBM) trials at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. The analysis will avoid pitfalls that obscure the true picture of PTAB proceedings and will address how the statistics should shape your PTAB trial strategies.


This webinar will cover topics including: 

• A dive into PTAB statistics

• Overall success rates, on a claim by claim basis

• Comparisons of success rates for statutory grounds 

• Trends in institution rates

• Comparisons to district court success rates

• Differences in technology areas

• The likely reasons behind the numbers

• A glimpse into the future 

As with all our webinars, there will also be an opportunity for the audience to ask questions of the panellists.

The webinar is free to attend: just register here and join us on Tuesday. 



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Price hikes at ‘big law’ firms are pushing some clients toward boutiques that offer predictable fees, specialised expertise, and a model built around prioritising IP
The Australian side, in particular, can benefit by capitalising on its independent status to bring in more work from Western countries while still working with its former Chinese partner
Koen Bijvank of Brinkhof and Johannes Heselberger of Bardehle Pagenberg discuss the Amgen v Sanofi case and why it will be cited frequently
View the official winners of the 2025 Social Impact EMEA Awards
King & Wood Mallesons will break into two entities, 14 years after a merger between a Chinese and an Australian firm created the combined outfit
Teams from Shakespeare Martineau and DWF will take centre stage in a dispute concerning the registrability of dairy terminology in plant-based products
Senem Kayahan, attorney and founder at PatentSe, discusses how she divides prosecution tasks, and reveals the importance of empathetic client advice
The association’s Australian group has filed a formal complaint against the choice of venue, citing Dubai as an unsafe environment for the LGBTQIA+ community
Firm says appointment of Nick McDonald will boost its expertise in cross-border disputes, including at the Unified Patent Court
In the final episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss the IP Inclusive Charter and the senior leaders’ pledge
Gift this article