Board discusses INTA plans

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Board discusses INTA plans

INTA-Board-168

INTA’s Board of Directors held its second meeting of the year yesterday, and tackled a wide range of issues affecting the Association and members.

INTA-Board

Some of the highlights were:

•    A focus group was held in the afternoon to obtain the Board’s feedback on the 2018-2021 Strategic Plan. This complements the engagement with various stakeholders including those outside of the IP community to further the Association’s goal of building bridges. Focus groups are also being held in Orlando to obtain feedback from a diverse group of members.

•    An overview of the nominations process was presented and available on inta.org under Membership and Committees/Committee Participation. Nominations for 2017 officers and Board of Directors can be submitted through the Nominations Portal on the INTA website until June 3, 2016. In addition to seeking diversity of leadership, the Nominating Committee’s suggested criteria for Board nominations includes a depth of knowledge in trademark law; appreciation of the issues facing INTA; commitment to INTA by regular meeting attendance, timely completion of substantive tasks and high quality work product; and demonstration of strong leadership qualities in order to be role models for other INTA volunteers. Under the revised Bylaws, the Nominating Committee (see box) has the discretion to nominate up to three Advisory Directors for election by the Board of Directors as non-voting members of the Board appointed for a one-year term. Advisory Directors are meant to be non-members of the Association, whose special expertise may be needed for certain issues being considered by the Board.

•    INTA’s Code of Policies: The Board approved a revised draft of this important code, which supplements INTA’s recently revised Bylaws. Both Bylaws and the Code are available on the INTA website.

•    2016 In-House Counsel Presidential Task Force Co-Chairs Jacqueline Leimer and Andrea Klein provided an update on their Task Force, “The Role and Position of In-house Trademark Professionals.” The Task Force will ­submit a final report and recommendations later this year.

•    The Programming Advisory Council’s proposal for 2017 educational events was outlined.

Strategic Plan

The Planning Committee wants to build upon the existing Strategic Plan and be as inclusive and forward thinking as possible when drafting the next Strategic Plan in order for INTA to: continue to be the leading advocate for the interests of brand owners; increase consumer protection; build bridges within and outside the IP community; and explore the nexus between brands and innovation.

With this in mind the Planning Committee has started to obtain feedback not only from INTA members and staff, but also from individuals from other IP organizations and individuals from non-IP organizations, such as business school professors, CEOs, marketing and consumer experts, media professionals and legislators.

The Planning Committee is also taking advantage of the Annual Meeting to obtain feedback from a diverse group of INTA members as part of the strategic planning process. The idea is to collect the feedback from these various constituencies by early summer so that the Planning Committee can begin its analysis and the drafting process from June to September of this year.

The intent is to finalize the Strategic Plan in March 2017 so that the communication of the 2018-2021 Strategic Plan can be rolled out in May 2017.

Read an interview with INTA’s CEO Etienne Sanz de Acedo on pages 6-7.

Nominating Committee

J. Scott Evans, Immediate Past President, Chair

Toe Su Aung, Past President

Rodrigo Marre, Associate Member

Dana Northcott, Regular Member

Gabrielle Olsson Skalin, Regular Member

Charles Shaban, Associate Member

Mei-lan Stark, Past President

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Lawyers say the overhaul better reflects commercial reality, with changes spanning novelty searches, digital designs and access to a small claims track, but stopping short of criminalising unregistered design infringement
Carpmaels & Ransford hires its fourth partner of the year and wins access to UPC files, as fresh orders address costs, confidentiality and the use of divisional patents
Peter Ling of Lenz & Staehelin in Zurich discusses trends in patent litigation, the regulation of AI and the benefits of teaching IP
Gift this article