EU Design Reform Phase 2: EUIPO Introduces MP4 Filings for Animated Designs

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

EU Design Reform Phase 2: EUIPO Introduces MP4 Filings for Animated Designs

Sponsored by

23Murgitroyd..png

Wendy Crosby and Steven Suèr from Murgitroyd talk how EUIPO Introduces MP4 Filings for Animated Designs

The European Union's design reform programme continues to gather pace.

Following the first phase of changes introduced in May 2025, a further set of reforms will come into effect on 1 July 2026, bringing important updates to how designs can be represented in applications filed with the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

While some of the changes provide greater flexibility for traditional design filings, the most significant development is the introduction of video-based design representations. 

For businesses developing software, graphical user interfaces (GUIs), digital products and other dynamic visual content, this marks an important step forward in the evolution of design protection. 

More flexibility for EU design representations

From 1 July 2026, applicants will be able to submit up to ten protected representations of a design when filing an application with the EUIPO.

This increase provides greater flexibility when depicting products from multiple angles or illustrating more complex designs. It may also prove useful for applicants coordinating international filing strategies, particularly where priority claims are intended, and other jurisdictions permit a greater number of views than has historically been accepted by the EUIPO.

Although many applicants will welcome this change, it is the EUIPO's new approach to animated designs that is likely to have the greatest impact.

Animated designs can now be filed as MP4 videos

In recognition of the growing importance of digital products and user experiences, the EUIPO will now accept MP4 video files as a form of design representation for animated designs.

Until now, applicants seeking protection for animated content have generally been required to rely on a series of static images to demonstrate movement or transitions. While effective in some circumstances, static representations can struggle to capture the full nature of a dynamic design.

The new system will allow applicants to submit a single MP4 file showing the design in motion, offering a more natural and potentially more accurate representation of animated visual elements.

This development could be particularly relevant for:

·       graphical user interfaces (GUIs);

·       software and mobile application animations;

·       screen transitions and visual effects;

·       animated icons and indicators;

·       virtual and augmented reality environments; and

·       other digital products that incorporate movement as part of the user experience. 

For example, a business developing a distinctive animated loading sequence, menu transition or interactive visual effect may now be able to demonstrate the design directly through video, rather than attempting to recreate the movement across multiple still images.

Filing requirements for video design representations

The EUIPO has published detailed technical requirements governing both image and video submissions, including specifications for file formats, resolution, and quality standards.

Businesses considering the use of animated design filings should ensure that their design, marketing and product development teams are aware of these requirements and incorporate them into the design creation process where appropriate.

A welcome development for digital innovation

The introduction of video-based representations reflects the reality that many modern designs are no longer static.

As digital products become increasingly sophisticated, movement, animation, and interaction often form part of the overall visual impression created by a design. Allowing applicants to represent those features more accurately should help ensure that registered design protection keeps pace with modern product development.

The change also aligns with broader efforts by the EUIPO to modernise design protection and accommodate emerging technologies and digital-first business models.

Protecting animated designs internationally: why static views still matter

Despite the opportunities presented by the new system, businesses should carefully consider their wider international protection strategy before relying exclusively on video representations.

While the EUIPO is moving quickly to accommodate digital and animated designs, not all intellectual property offices worldwide have adopted equivalent filing practices. This can create challenges where applicants intend to claim priority from an EU filing when seeking protection in other jurisdictions.

For this reason, businesses filing animated or digital designs may wish to consider a dual-filing approach, submitting both:

·       an MP4 representation showing the design in motion; and

·       a traditional set of static design views.

This approach may provide greater flexibility when pursuing international protection and help minimise potential issues when claiming priority in territories that continue to rely primarily on static representations. It may also be easier with static views to disclaim portions of the design using either dotted lines or colour washing techniques.

The future of digital design protection

The second phase of the EU design reform package represents another significant step towards a modernised design protection system that better reflects the way products are developed and experienced today.

For businesses operating in software, consumer electronics, gaming, automotive interfaces and other digitally driven sectors, the ability to file animated design representations opens up new possibilities for protecting innovation and strengthening intellectual property portfolios. 

As these changes come into force, now is a good time for businesses to review their design protection strategies and consider whether new opportunities exist to secure protection for digital and animated design features that may previously have been difficult to represent through static imagery alone.

If you would like to discuss how the latest EU design reforms could affect your design filing strategy, or whether animated and digital design features may be suitable for protection, our design specialists would be happy to help.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Armstrong Teasdale’s Jim Heinen Jr discusses the challenge of balancing billables, business development and family life and explains why not all patent lawyers are science nerds
From cross-border jurisdiction to the end of the transitional period, Powell Gilbert’s Ioana Sabau and Bryce Matthewson predict the biggest talking points ahead
A wave of office launches and lateral hires reflect the draw of patent disputes, but booming AI, semiconductor and data centre markets are offering an even bigger IP opportunity
The hire of Frederick Nicolle as a partner continues Pinsent Masons' expansion while reducing Simmons’ patent prosecution offering in London to zero
The expansion into Granada forms part of a national ‘decentralisation’ strategy focused on providing proximity to research and tech businesses away from traditional hubs
Three successive wins have got the firm eyeing additional opportunities as ITC work booms
While many firms remain focused on generative AI, recent hires and practice launches suggest the next battle may be for lawyers who understand how AI is moving into the physical world
The explosion of data centres has prompted patent pool operators to create new licensing opportunities
The court struck out copyright claims brought by Ladbrokes owner Entain, saying that ownership details should have been completed before litigation began
Düsseldorf has overtaken Munich as the UPC's busiest division, while firms including Winston Taylor, Clifford Chance, and Hoyng Rokh Monegier featured in disputes involving Abbott, Essity, Amazon and Hurom
Gift this article