Frasers property limited v house of fraser brands limited and others (UK Intellectual Property Office, Registrar S. Wilson), O/0301/26, 7 April 2026

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Frasers property limited v house of fraser brands limited and others (UK Intellectual Property Office, Registrar S. Wilson), O/0301/26, 7 April 2026

Sponsored by

26Birketts.png

Michael Conway from Birketts speaks about Frasers property limited v house of Fraser brands limited and others

This case is the largest consolidated trademark proceedings to date as the UKIPO determined more than 30 consolidated revocation, invalidation and opposition actions between House of Fraser Brands Limited (“HOF”) and Frasers Property Limited (“FPL”). HOF’s rebrand to FRASERS was not as successful as envisaged as the brand protection they were seeking suffered a significant loss of scope in the UK - most notably sectors which FPL was already established in such as real estate, financial services and accommodation.

In relation to FPL’s revocations, the Registrar found that the use of HOUSE OF FRASER was limited outside of the context of retail services and FRASERS was not a permitted variation of HOUSE OF FRASER. FPL was overall, successful in protecting their marks because of its genuine use of its marks in these sectors.

It also found that HOF reputation was not sufficient to displace FPL in the property and hospitality sectors, in dismissing HOF’s invalidation claims.

FPL was successful in its oppositions and prevented significant parts of HOF’s registration of HOF’s FRASERS and FRASERS GROUP FINANCIAL SERVICES in property, financial and accommodation classes and the Registrar found that registration would have likely caused confusion between the two parties in those sectors.

Reference: https://www.oeclaw.co.uk/news/view/ukipo-determines-largest-consolidated-trade-mark-proceedings-to-date

Full judgment: https://www.ipo.gov.uk/t-challenge-decision-results/o030126.pdf

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Armstrong Teasdale’s Jim Heinen Jr discusses the challenge of balancing billables, business development and family life and explains why not all patent lawyers are science nerds
From cross-border jurisdiction to the end of the transitional period, Powell Gilbert’s Ioana Sabau and Bryce Matthewson predict the biggest talking points ahead
A wave of office launches and lateral hires reflect the draw of patent disputes, but booming AI, semiconductor and data centre markets are offering an even bigger IP opportunity
The hire of Frederick Nicolle as a partner continues Pinsent Masons' expansion while reducing Simmons’ patent prosecution offering in London to zero
The expansion into Granada forms part of a national ‘decentralisation’ strategy focused on providing proximity to research and tech businesses away from traditional hubs
Three successive wins have got the firm eyeing additional opportunities as ITC work booms
While many firms remain focused on generative AI, recent hires and practice launches suggest the next battle may be for lawyers who understand how AI is moving into the physical world
The explosion of data centres has prompted patent pool operators to create new licensing opportunities
The court struck out copyright claims brought by Ladbrokes owner Entain, saying that ownership details should have been completed before litigation began
Düsseldorf has overtaken Munich as the UPC's busiest division, while firms including Winston Taylor, Clifford Chance, and Hoyng Rokh Monegier featured in disputes involving Abbott, Essity, Amazon and Hurom
Gift this article