Frasers property limited v house of fraser brands limited and others (UK Intellectual Property Office, Registrar S. Wilson), O/0301/26, 7 April 2026

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Frasers property limited v house of fraser brands limited and others (UK Intellectual Property Office, Registrar S. Wilson), O/0301/26, 7 April 2026

Sponsored by

26Birketts.png

Michael Conway from Birketts speaks about Frasers property limited v house of Fraser brands limited and others

This case is the largest consolidated trademark proceedings to date as the UKIPO determined more than 30 consolidated revocation, invalidation and opposition actions between House of Fraser Brands Limited (“HOF”) and Frasers Property Limited (“FPL”). HOF’s rebrand to FRASERS was not as successful as envisaged as the brand protection they were seeking suffered a significant loss of scope in the UK - most notably sectors which FPL was already established in such as real estate, financial services and accommodation.

In relation to FPL’s revocations, the Registrar found that the use of HOUSE OF FRASER was limited outside of the context of retail services and FRASERS was not a permitted variation of HOUSE OF FRASER. FPL was overall, successful in protecting their marks because of its genuine use of its marks in these sectors.

It also found that HOF reputation was not sufficient to displace FPL in the property and hospitality sectors, in dismissing HOF’s invalidation claims.

FPL was successful in its oppositions and prevented significant parts of HOF’s registration of HOF’s FRASERS and FRASERS GROUP FINANCIAL SERVICES in property, financial and accommodation classes and the Registrar found that registration would have likely caused confusion between the two parties in those sectors.

Reference: https://www.oeclaw.co.uk/news/view/ukipo-determines-largest-consolidated-trade-mark-proceedings-to-date

Full judgment: https://www.ipo.gov.uk/t-challenge-decision-results/o030126.pdf

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Rebekah Gay discusses overcoming self-doubt, supporting the next generation of women lawyers, and how changing client demands are reshaping IP practice
New filing data suggests Germany's grip on UPC litigation remains strong, while Bardehle Pagenberg, Arnold Ruess, Hogan Lovells and Carpmaels notch up notable cases
In 27 years, KASS has expanded to seven countries in southeast Asia and is now eyeing further growth opportunities. Its CEO shares her perspective
Mine Güner discusses bridging law and business, taking the initiative, and why Taylor Swift helped put copyright on the map
Cindy Goh discusses why she launched Cheang & Ariff's IP department, the improving litigation environment in Malaysia and what to consider when using AI
Increased focus on adding patent litigation depth to the firm’s Dallas office was behind the boutique’s most recent hires
IPH's Canadian acquisitions are paying off on paper, but a couple of strong years may not be enough to show that the group's strategy has truly won over the market
Examiner statistics could help patent prosecution practitioners tailor strategies, turning an area of high variability into a potential competitive advantage
The England and Wales High Court’s ruling in Accord v Novartis may not rewrite the law on plausibility, but it does signal a pragmatic approach that could provide greater certainty for life sciences innovators
Firms with established sports relationships and specialised expertise are well positioned to capture the market’s expanded pool of IP work
Gift this article