Frasers property limited v house of fraser brands limited and others (UK Intellectual Property Office, Registrar S. Wilson), O/0301/26, 7 April 2026

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Frasers property limited v house of fraser brands limited and others (UK Intellectual Property Office, Registrar S. Wilson), O/0301/26, 7 April 2026

Sponsored by

26Birketts.png

Michael Conway from Birketts speaks about Frasers property limited v house of Fraser brands limited and others

This case is the largest consolidated trademark proceedings to date as the UKIPO determined more than 30 consolidated revocation, invalidation and opposition actions between House of Fraser Brands Limited (“HOF”) and Frasers Property Limited (“FPL”). HOF’s rebrand to FRASERS was not as successful as envisaged as the brand protection they were seeking suffered a significant loss of scope in the UK - most notably sectors which FPL was already established in such as real estate, financial services and accommodation.

In relation to FPL’s revocations, the Registrar found that the use of HOUSE OF FRASER was limited outside of the context of retail services and FRASERS was not a permitted variation of HOUSE OF FRASER. FPL was overall, successful in protecting their marks because of its genuine use of its marks in these sectors.

It also found that HOF reputation was not sufficient to displace FPL in the property and hospitality sectors, in dismissing HOF’s invalidation claims.

FPL was successful in its oppositions and prevented significant parts of HOF’s registration of HOF’s FRASERS and FRASERS GROUP FINANCIAL SERVICES in property, financial and accommodation classes and the Registrar found that registration would have likely caused confusion between the two parties in those sectors.

Reference: https://www.oeclaw.co.uk/news/view/ukipo-determines-largest-consolidated-trade-mark-proceedings-to-date

Full judgment: https://www.ipo.gov.uk/t-challenge-decision-results/o030126.pdf

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

On a recent trip to the French capital, we learned that the UPC is squeezing domestic litigation while firms are chasing senior talent, experimenting with AI and considering new ways of organising their practices
Daniel Law says a string of lateral hires and broader expansion plans will strengthen its position to capitalise on Brazil’s burgeoning IP and patent litigation market
Jason Raeburn’s arrival will expand the firm’s London footprint in AI, copyright and tech disputes
The firm is shaping its AI strategy around partnerships with Harvey and Legora alongside internally developed tools from its legal technology company, Eltemate
A dispute Down Under shows why trademark lawyers cannot afford to wait on the sidelines when a rival brand gathers momentum
The Third Circuit’s decision in Thomson Reuters v ROSS marks the first appellate-level decision addressing AI and fair use, prompting copyright counsel to consider arguments around potential licensing markets
Injunctions for HandsFree Labs and Align Technology come as the Court of Appeal warns that busy teams must have the staffing and resources to meet UPC deadlines
The chief technology officer remit, which has been created as the firm is building its litigation team, will include expanding the use of AI in patent and legal work and automating manual processes
Former Hoyng Rokh Moneiger partner Laura Alonso, who brought her team to ECIJA in March, discusses plans to expand further and why ECIJA’s ‘IP DNA’ is helping broaden her work
Amita Haylock discusses building an integrated Asia practice as clients increasingly demand that firms combine IP, technology and data expertise
Gift this article