Data protection and privacy law in TÜRKİYE key developments and predictions

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Data protection and privacy law in TÜRKİYE key developments and predictions

Sponsored by

GünPartners_Turkey.png

Gün + Partners talk about data protection and privacy laws in Türkiye

In this year’s report, we focus on the latest developments in the field of personal data protection, recent decisions, and published guidelines, as well as the fundamental regulations and principles of personal data protection law. Additionally, we analyse key developments in Turkiye, current significant issues in this area, and expectations, evaluations, and trends for the future.

The year 2024 has once again been marked by significant developments in personal data protection. We have witnessed the long-anticipated amendments to the Law on the Protection of Personal Data No. 6698 (“Law”) coming into effect, secondary legislation efforts, and the Personal Data Protection Authority’s (“Authority”) guidance and publications aimed at providing direction to data controllers. Additionally, efforts were made to enhance awareness and effectiveness in personal data protection, ensure the effective implementation of the Law, and establish the proper relationship between the Law and other legal fields it intersects with, particularly competition law.

With the impact of regulations in the EU resonating in our country, discussions surrounding artificial intelligence (AI), although not yet at the desired level of maturity, have gained more prominence in 2024. In the new digital era that has taken hold worldwide, the steps to be taken in personal data protection and how to strike a balance between technology and privacy will continue to be key topics on the agenda in the coming years.

While we continue to witness positive developments each year in terms of compliance with the Law, the amendments introduced in 2024 made the second half of the year particularly intense for data controllers, as they focused on extensive compliance efforts, especially regarding cross-border data transfers.

Digital platforms, which play an increasingly central role in users’ lives and pose privacy threats and risks due to large-scale data collection, processing, and sharing, remain a focal point for the Personal Data Protection Board (“Board”), as they do worldwide. With the growth of the digital economy, the data collection and processing activities of digital platforms have created a significant intersection between data protection and competition law. Notably, the competition investigation conducted by the Turkish Competition Authority against social network provider META is expected to have implications in the field of personal data protection as well.

The statistics in the information note published by the Board regarding its activities in 2024 indicate an increase in the number of notices, complaints, and applications compared to the previous year. While the Board continued its examinations intensively throughout 2024, only two of its decisions were publicly announced.

As a result of emerging practical needs and the objective of aligning the Law with the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), significant legislative amendments were introduced in the field of personal data protection in 2024. The amendments, which came into force on June 1, 2024, marked the beginning of a new era in personal data protection, with compliance required by September 1, 2024. Within this framework, the “Regulation on the Procedures and Principles for Cross-Border Transfers of Personal Data” was published on July 10, 2024. The limited timeframe for compliance has posed challenges for both data controllers and practitioners, and for many data controllers, the compliance process is still ongoing.

In 2024, the Board continued to publish various guidelines, documents, and information notes to raise awareness in the field of data protection and provide guidance to practitioners. The Guideline on the Processing of Turkish Republic Identity Numbers outlined key considerations regarding the processing of Turkish ID numbers, which, due to their potential to grant access to other personal data, could lead to significant risks and harm if mishandled. Meanwhile, the Guideline on the Protection of Personal Data in Election Activities reminded public authorities, political parties, candidates, and voters of their obligations and rights under the Law. Additionally, the Authority published several informative materials aimed at practitioners, including the Deepfake Information Note, the Information Note on the Legal Basis for Personal Data Processing Stipulated by Law, the Information Note on the Temporal Application of Misdemeanors under Law No. 6698, the Information Note on Chatbots (Example: ChatGPT), and the Most Common Mistakes in Complaints and Notifications Submitted to the Board. These publications provided practical insights to help ensure compliance with data protection regulations.

As part of cross-border data transfers, the Standard Contract Notification Module system was established, allowing data controllers to electronically notify the Authority of standard contractual clauses, which are one of the appropriate safeguards regulated under the Law.

In 2024, the Board imposed administrative fines totaling 552,668,000 Turkish liras, with the majority of these penalties being issued against data controllers who failed to fulfil their obligation to register with the data controllers’ registry and submit the required notifications despite being subject to this requirement.

In its Public Announcement regarding the Data Controllers’ Registry published in August 2024, the Authority stated that the Board had initiated ex officio investigations into data controllers who failed to fulfill their registration and notification obligations. As of August 1, 2024, the Board had imposed 503,935,000 Turkish liras in administrative fines on both domestic and foreign natural and legal person data controllers who were subject to this obligation but had not complied.

As a result of the developments regarding the cross-border data transfers a total of 1,345 standard contracts were notified to the Board in 2024 (based on the Authority's records for the June–December period). These figures indicate that compliance efforts are still ongoing among data controllers.

Data Protection and Privacy Law in Türkiye Key Developments and Predictions - 2025 | Gün + Partners

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Boehringer Ingelheim has instructed a team from Kirkland, while Teva is being represented by Pinsent Masons
The Delhi High Court’s latest directions offer an opportunity to move beyond remedies against bad-faith registrations and address how suspicious applications are identified in the first place, says Fatima Baig at Lexlinc
Camilla Hamrin describes how the acquisition by Acapo Onsagers will impact Bergenstråhle’s trademark practice – and reflects on changes she has seen over 30 years in IP
On a recent trip to the French capital, we learned that the UPC is squeezing domestic litigation while firms are chasing senior talent, experimenting with AI and considering new ways of organising their practices
Daniel Law says a string of lateral hires and broader expansion plans will strengthen its position to capitalise on Brazil’s burgeoning IP and patent litigation market
Jason Raeburn’s arrival will expand the firm’s London footprint in AI, copyright and tech disputes
The firm is shaping its AI strategy around partnerships with Harvey and Legora alongside internally developed tools from its legal technology company, Eltemate
A dispute Down Under shows why trademark lawyers cannot afford to wait on the sidelines when a rival brand gathers momentum
The Third Circuit’s decision in Thomson Reuters v ROSS marks the first appellate-level decision addressing AI and fair use, prompting copyright counsel to consider arguments around potential licensing markets
Injunctions for HandsFree Labs and Align Technology come as the Court of Appeal warns that busy teams must have the staffing and resources to meet UPC deadlines
Gift this article