Patent law in TÜRKİYE key developments and predictions

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Patent law in TÜRKİYE key developments and predictions

Sponsored by

GünPartners_Turkey.png

Gün + Partners talk about patent law in Türkiye

In recent years, there have been significant changes in patent law globally and also in Türkiye.  Developments of the past year provide guidance for patent owners, industry and legal professionals in what to expect from patent law in 2025. The dynamic nature of patent law, technological developments, new legislative regulations and disputes in the area of patents have continued to restructure the mechanisms of patent protection.

While artificial intelligence has led the pharmaceutical industry into a new era, uncertainties still remain regarding the impact of artificial intelligence on patentability. While the European Patent Office (EPO) assesses AI-aided inventions in accordance to traditional criteria, it is inevitable that discussions on AI-aided inventions in Türkiye are expected to become more prominent in the coming days. In addition, jurisdictional disputes and anti-suit injunction decisions in international patent litigation are increasingly being discussed in the patent law ecosystem. For example, the decisions of Chinese courts to prevent patent holders from filing lawsuits in different countries through anti-suit injunction decisions are considered as a violation of TRIPS by the European Union. The validity and enforceability of anti-suit injunction decisions, the position and jurisdiction of the courts in international cases in terms of companies operating in Türkiye are also open to debate. The Unified Patent Court (UPC), which operates as a common court for European Patents, and the jurisdictional boundaries of the UPC are also one of the topics of discussion, and interesting decisions are expected to leave their mark on 2025. Although Türkiye is not a party to the UPC’s founding charter, it is envisaged that the UPC may extend its jurisdiction to Turkish companies with assets in the European Union under the Brussels IB regulation. This raises the possibility of awarding damages against Turkish companies in infringement proceedings under European Patents and before the UPC.

In addition to these international level developments, it seems that practices such as discovery of evidence or preliminary injunctions and the current challenges regarding implementation in Türkiye will continue to be discussed with a view to protecting the rights of patent holders. While the discovery of evidence mechanism in Türkiye is a critical means in the pharmaceutical and technology sectors, differences in court praxis continues to create legal uncertainty

To summarise, the developments in 2024 reveal once again the dynamic nature of patent law. It is evident that deliberations in the field of artificial intelligence and biotechnology, legislative uncertainties in the implementation of legal mechanisms essential for the protection of patent rights, and the limits of the jurisdiction of international courts shall set the frame for discussions in 2025. Increased legal certainty is critical for the establishment and sustainability of a patent system that not only supports, but also protects innovation.

Our hope is that this compilation of significant developments will be of benefit for legal professionals, patent owners and other stakeholders in the field of patent law.

Patent Law in Türkiye Key Developments and Predictions - 2025 | Gün + Partners

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Rebekah Gay discusses overcoming self-doubt, supporting the next generation of women lawyers, and how changing client demands are reshaping IP practice
New filing data suggests Germany's grip on UPC litigation remains strong, while Bardehle Pagenberg, Arnold Ruess, Hogan Lovells and Carpmaels notch up notable cases
In 27 years, KASS has expanded to seven countries in southeast Asia and is now eyeing further growth opportunities. Its CEO shares her perspective
Mine Güner discusses bridging law and business, taking the initiative, and why Taylor Swift helped put copyright on the map
Cindy Goh discusses why she launched Cheang & Ariff's IP department, the improving litigation environment in Malaysia and what to consider when using AI
Increased focus on adding patent litigation depth to the firm’s Dallas office was behind the boutique’s most recent hires
IPH's Canadian acquisitions are paying off on paper, but a couple of strong years may not be enough to show that the group's strategy has truly won over the market
Examiner statistics could help patent prosecution practitioners tailor strategies, turning an area of high variability into a potential competitive advantage
The England and Wales High Court’s ruling in Accord v Novartis may not rewrite the law on plausibility, but it does signal a pragmatic approach that could provide greater certainty for life sciences innovators
Firms with established sports relationships and specialised expertise are well positioned to capture the market’s expanded pool of IP work
Gift this article