Trademark law in TÜRKİYE key developments and predictions

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Trademark law in TÜRKİYE key developments and predictions

Sponsored by

GünPartners_Turkey.png

Gün + Partners talk about key developments and predictions in trademarking in Türkiye

The year 2024 can be described as a stable yet relatively uneventful period for Turkish trademark law, with no major legislative changes or ground-breaking reforms.

As of 10 January 2024, the regulation allowing the administrative revocation of trademarks before the Turkish Patent and Trademark Office officially entered into force. However, the anticipated secondary regulations were not implemented, leaving uncertainties surrounding the process throughout the year. Similarly, the uncertainty surrounding the Well-Known Trademark Registry remains unresolved. One notable development in concern with the Turkish Patent and Trademark Office was the update to the trademark classification system.

In terms of case law, a significant decision was issued by the 16th Civil Chamber of the Istanbul Regional Court of Appeal, which revisited the principle of loss of rights due to acquiescence in trademark infringement cases. This decision introduced a fresh perspective to the discussion. Additionally, the Court of Cassation’s ruling on the likelihood of confusion in pharmaceutical trademarks has contributed a new dimension to ongoing legal debates. Also, the registration of series titles as trademarks in the television and film industry has re-ignited discussions on the intersection between trademark law and copyright law.

At the same time, developments in domain name disputes and online trademark enforcement have also been noteworthy, as digital platforms continue to be a battleground for intellectual property rights.

Artificial intelligence (AI) continues to shape trademark law, just as it does in other legal fields. From trademark creation to enforcement, AI-driven solutions are raising new legal questions and challenges.

Despite persistent challenges, the fight against counterfeit products remains a key area of focus. In particular, the battle against counterfeit auto spare parts—given the serious safety risks involved—has gained momentum, with increased collaboration between automotive associations and law firms leading to significant outcomes.

In this publication, we provide insights into these developments and their implications for trademark law. 

Trademark Law in Türkiye Key Developments and Predictions - 2025 | Gün + Partners

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Rebekah Gay discusses overcoming self-doubt, supporting the next generation of women lawyers, and how changing client demands are reshaping IP practice
New filing data suggests Germany's grip on UPC litigation remains strong, while Bardehle Pagenberg, Arnold Ruess, Hogan Lovells and Carpmaels notch up notable cases
In 27 years, KASS has expanded to seven countries in southeast Asia and is now eyeing further growth opportunities. Its CEO shares her perspective
Mine Güner discusses bridging law and business, taking the initiative, and why Taylor Swift helped put copyright on the map
Cindy Goh discusses why she launched Cheang & Ariff's IP department, the improving litigation environment in Malaysia and what to consider when using AI
Increased focus on adding patent litigation depth to the firm’s Dallas office was behind the boutique’s most recent hires
IPH's Canadian acquisitions are paying off on paper, but a couple of strong years may not be enough to show that the group's strategy has truly won over the market
Examiner statistics could help patent prosecution practitioners tailor strategies, turning an area of high variability into a potential competitive advantage
The England and Wales High Court’s ruling in Accord v Novartis may not rewrite the law on plausibility, but it does signal a pragmatic approach that could provide greater certainty for life sciences innovators
Firms with established sports relationships and specialised expertise are well positioned to capture the market’s expanded pool of IP work
Gift this article