A Landmark Victory for The Luzzatto Group in Eli Lilly’s Case – Appeal on Costs Awarded by the ILPTO

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

A Landmark Victory for The Luzzatto Group in Eli Lilly’s Case – Appeal on Costs Awarded by the ILPTO

Sponsored by

23LuzzattoGroupIsrael.png

The Luzzatto Group talk about latest update regarding a recent ruling obtained by the firm

We are pleased to share an important legal update regarding a recent ruling obtained by our firm. The Jerusalem District Court handed down a decision in an appeal against the ruling of the Registrar of Patents. The appeal concerned a ruling on costs in an opposition, which was appealed against as being unfounded and extremely excessive. The appeal originally addressed the ruling in its entirety but was then restricted to costs only since the patent had expired in the meantime.

In this case, ELI LILLY filed a patent application for its groundbreaking drug, Forteo, for the treatment of osteoporosis, and Teva filed an opposition to the patent. The Israeli Patent Registrar accepted Teva's opposition and awarded legal costs in the amount of 1,837,265 NIS. In the appeal, we argued that the award of costs was excessively high, and the Court ruled in our favor, reducing the costs by nearly 50% to a total of 1,000,000 NIS.

This ruling is exceptional, as courts of appeal typically refrain from intervening in rulings of the costs. This decision is a significant precedent, sending a clear message to the Patent Office that costs awarded in patent proceedings cannot exceed the norms applied by the Israeli courts.

This ruling is not only a victory for our client but also an important step in ensuring fairness and balance in the awarding of costs in the Israeli Patent Office. It establishes a precedent that could affect similar cases in the future.

We take pride in this achievement and remain committed to fighting for our clients' rights.

Eli Lilly was represented in this case by Patent Attorney Dr. Kfir Luzzatto, Attorney Oren Mandler, and Patent Attorney Dr. Adina Cohen

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

On a recent trip to the French capital, we learned that the UPC is squeezing domestic litigation while firms are chasing senior talent, experimenting with AI and considering new ways of organising their practices
Daniel Law says a string of lateral hires and broader expansion plans will strengthen its position to capitalise on Brazil’s burgeoning IP and patent litigation market
Jason Raeburn’s arrival will expand the firm’s London footprint in AI, copyright and tech disputes
The firm is shaping its AI strategy around partnerships with Harvey and Legora alongside internally developed tools from its legal technology company, Eltemate
A dispute Down Under shows why trademark lawyers cannot afford to wait on the sidelines when a rival brand gathers momentum
The Third Circuit’s decision in Thomson Reuters v ROSS marks the first appellate-level decision addressing AI and fair use, prompting copyright counsel to consider arguments around potential licensing markets
Injunctions for HandsFree Labs and Align Technology come as the Court of Appeal warns that busy teams must have the staffing and resources to meet UPC deadlines
The chief technology officer remit, which has been created as the firm is building its litigation team, will include expanding the use of AI in patent and legal work and automating manual processes
Former Hoyng Rokh Moneiger partner Laura Alonso, who brought her team to ECIJA in March, discusses plans to expand further and why ECIJA’s ‘IP DNA’ is helping broaden her work
Amita Haylock discusses building an integrated Asia practice as clients increasingly demand that firms combine IP, technology and data expertise
Gift this article