New procedure to expedite the granting of Mexican patent applications

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

New procedure to expedite the granting of Mexican patent applications

Sponsored by

22BashamRingeCorrea_banner.png

Mariana Gonzalez, partner of the Intellectual Property Practice in Basham Ringe y Correa about the new procedure to expedite the granting or Mexican patent applications.

Recently a new procedure was implemented between the Mexican Patent Office (IMPI) and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to expedite the granting of Mexican patent applications based on the examination of a US corresponding application, it is the Accelerated Patent Grant program (APG).

In conjunction with the existing Patent Prosecution Highway program (PPH) and the Parallel Patent Grant program (PPG), the APG emerges from collaborative efforts between IMPI and USPTO to streamline and accelerate procedures by exchanging work products. In the case of APG, it is possible to request it even when substantive examination has begun, unlike the PPH that requires that substantive examination has not started.

This program is only available for those patent applications being electronically prosecuted, so if a patent application is still being physically handled a request for its electronic prosecution before the IMPI is advisable.

Moreover, the following requirements should be noted:

a. The Mexican patent application must have a corresponding patent application in the USPTO that has been already granted and published as such.

b. The Mexican patent application should claim priority of a related US application or should share a priority claim, under the Paris Convention.

c. All the claims in the Mexican patent application should sufficiently correspond to those of the US patent application, meaning that format or different practice changes are allowable, but the Mexican scope should be the same or narrower than that of the US patent application. If required, it is feasible to file an amendment along with the APG request to fulfill this requirement. Deletion of claims is permitted.

d. The Mexican patent application has been published and the third-party-observations period (2 months after publication) is over.

For divisional applications, participation in the APG program will be suspended until the initial application is resolved definitively. The acceptance of participation in an initial patent application doesn't extend to divisional applications, so applicants must apply for each divisional application.

If the participation request doesn't meet the criteria, it is possible to reapply.

Expanding the paths to shorten patent prosecution timelines signifies a favorable development for applicants seeking protection in Mexico, enabling them to streamline the process and enhance the patent granting procedures. The APG program presents an appealing avenue for applicants with an US granted patent, supplementing the choices offered by the widely utilized PPH program, so it would be important to consider it when planning a patent strategy in Mexico.

author: 

Mariana Gonzalez, partner of the Intellectual Property Practice in Basham Ringe y Correa

For further information, please contact basham@basham.com.mx

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Fresh off a string of ITC victories, Latham has recruited Baker Botts’ ITC leader Lisa Kattan, adding another prominent name to one of the market's busiest ITC practices
The firm hopes its recent Düsseldorf expansion and UK partner hire will strengthen its offering as it looks to an integrated model to boost UPC capabilities
Stephenson Harwood’s trademark prosecution push and patent ambitions could complement Taylor Wessing’s remaining but depleted European IP strength following its UK arm’s departure
Gerben IP’s first woman partner, Sophie Edbrooke, explains how boutique life allowed her to broaden her expertise, take on leadership responsibilities and carve out a route to the top
INTA has a right to protect its Annual Meeting, but making it harder for others to hold similar events risks leaving delegates with a bigger travel bill
The firm says it hopes to capture patent litigation work in Texas by arming itself with experienced trial lawyers with venue expertise
Ken Iijima's arrival continues a trend of ex-Pizzeys practitioners joining RnB IP, whose co-founder says independent ownership and a lucrative compensation model have become attractive in a consolidating market
McDermott Will & Schulte lawyers explore why the UPC is seeing rapid adoption by medtech for fast-moving disputes, while pharma and biotech take a cautious, selective approach over revocation risks
IP firms may be growing more comfortable with external capital, but uncertainty over who could ultimately own the business is complicating the investment pitch
The former Western District of Texas judge addresses perceptions of his courtroom, reveals what comes next as he returns to practice at A&O Shearman and explains why marathon running is ‘cathartic’
Gift this article