New procedure to expedite the granting of Mexican patent applications

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

New procedure to expedite the granting of Mexican patent applications

Sponsored by

22BashamRingeCorrea_banner.png

Mariana Gonzalez, partner of the Intellectual Property Practice in Basham Ringe y Correa about the new procedure to expedite the granting or Mexican patent applications.

Recently a new procedure was implemented between the Mexican Patent Office (IMPI) and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to expedite the granting of Mexican patent applications based on the examination of a US corresponding application, it is the Accelerated Patent Grant program (APG).

In conjunction with the existing Patent Prosecution Highway program (PPH) and the Parallel Patent Grant program (PPG), the APG emerges from collaborative efforts between IMPI and USPTO to streamline and accelerate procedures by exchanging work products. In the case of APG, it is possible to request it even when substantive examination has begun, unlike the PPH that requires that substantive examination has not started.

This program is only available for those patent applications being electronically prosecuted, so if a patent application is still being physically handled a request for its electronic prosecution before the IMPI is advisable.

Moreover, the following requirements should be noted:

a. The Mexican patent application must have a corresponding patent application in the USPTO that has been already granted and published as such.

b. The Mexican patent application should claim priority of a related US application or should share a priority claim, under the Paris Convention.

c. All the claims in the Mexican patent application should sufficiently correspond to those of the US patent application, meaning that format or different practice changes are allowable, but the Mexican scope should be the same or narrower than that of the US patent application. If required, it is feasible to file an amendment along with the APG request to fulfill this requirement. Deletion of claims is permitted.

d. The Mexican patent application has been published and the third-party-observations period (2 months after publication) is over.

For divisional applications, participation in the APG program will be suspended until the initial application is resolved definitively. The acceptance of participation in an initial patent application doesn't extend to divisional applications, so applicants must apply for each divisional application.

If the participation request doesn't meet the criteria, it is possible to reapply.

Expanding the paths to shorten patent prosecution timelines signifies a favorable development for applicants seeking protection in Mexico, enabling them to streamline the process and enhance the patent granting procedures. The APG program presents an appealing avenue for applicants with an US granted patent, supplementing the choices offered by the widely utilized PPH program, so it would be important to consider it when planning a patent strategy in Mexico.

author: 

Mariana Gonzalez, partner of the Intellectual Property Practice in Basham Ringe y Correa

For further information, please contact basham@basham.com.mx

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Armstrong Teasdale’s Jim Heinen Jr discusses the challenge of balancing billables, business development and family life and explains why not all patent lawyers are science nerds
From cross-border jurisdiction to the end of the transitional period, Powell Gilbert’s Ioana Sabau and Bryce Matthewson predict the biggest talking points ahead
A wave of office launches and lateral hires reflect the draw of patent disputes, but booming AI, semiconductor and data centre markets are offering an even bigger IP opportunity
The hire of Frederick Nicolle as a partner continues Pinsent Masons' expansion while reducing Simmons’ patent prosecution offering in London to zero
The expansion into Granada forms part of a national ‘decentralisation’ strategy focused on providing proximity to research and tech businesses away from traditional hubs
Three successive wins have got the firm eyeing additional opportunities as ITC work booms
While many firms remain focused on generative AI, recent hires and practice launches suggest the next battle may be for lawyers who understand how AI is moving into the physical world
The explosion of data centres has prompted patent pool operators to create new licensing opportunities
The court struck out copyright claims brought by Ladbrokes owner Entain, saying that ownership details should have been completed before litigation began
Düsseldorf has overtaken Munich as the UPC's busiest division, while firms including Winston Taylor, Clifford Chance, and Hoyng Rokh Monegier featured in disputes involving Abbott, Essity, Amazon and Hurom
Gift this article