Leo Patent Law Office Adopts Subscription-Based Patent Prosecution Services

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Leo Patent Law Office Adopts Subscription-Based Patent Prosecution Services

Sponsored by

Leo logo (002).png

No more hourly billing, no more flat-fees for each action. Leo Patent Law Office announces a transformative shift in its billing model. In a bold move to better serve its clients and provide more transparency, the firm has transitioned from traditional hourly billing to a modern and client-centric subscription-based model.

No more hourly billing, no more flat-fees for each action. Leo Patent Law Office announces a transformative shift in its billing model. In a bold move to better serve its clients and provide more transparency, the firm has transitioned from traditional hourly billing to a modern and client-centric subscription-based model.

Clients can choose a low monthly subscription fee for a set number of hours of service per month, which includes patent application drafting, filing, and prosecution with the USPTO and EPO. This model provides all the advantages of having in-house counsel while maintaining the expertise and objectivity of external representation.

Ronny Amirsehhi, founder of Leo Patent Law Office, shared his thoughts on this strategic shift, saying, "We are excited to introduce this subscription-based billing model as a testament to our ongoing commitment to providing transparent patent prosecution services to our clients. We believe that this approach will not only simplify billing but also enable us to build stronger, long-lasting relationships with our clients."

This strategic decision reflects Leo Patent Law Office's dedication to providing a consistent and comprehensive prosecution strategy that maximizes patent protection while minimizing costs.

For more information about Leo Patent Law Office, please visit leoandus.com.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Boehringer Ingelheim has instructed a team from Kirkland, while Teva is being represented by Pinsent Masons
The Delhi High Court’s latest directions offer an opportunity to move beyond remedies against bad-faith registrations and address how suspicious applications are identified in the first place, says Fatima Baig at Lexlinc
Camilla Hamrin describes how the acquisition by Acapo Onsagers will impact Bergenstråhle’s trademark practice – and reflects on changes she has seen over 30 years in IP
On a recent trip to the French capital, we learned that the UPC is squeezing domestic litigation while firms are chasing senior talent, experimenting with AI and considering new ways of organising their practices
Daniel Law says a string of lateral hires and broader expansion plans will strengthen its position to capitalise on Brazil’s burgeoning IP and patent litigation market
Jason Raeburn’s arrival will expand the firm’s London footprint in AI, copyright and tech disputes
The firm is shaping its AI strategy around partnerships with Harvey and Legora alongside internally developed tools from its legal technology company, Eltemate
A dispute Down Under shows why trademark lawyers cannot afford to wait on the sidelines when a rival brand gathers momentum
The Third Circuit’s decision in Thomson Reuters v ROSS marks the first appellate-level decision addressing AI and fair use, prompting copyright counsel to consider arguments around potential licensing markets
Injunctions for HandsFree Labs and Align Technology come as the Court of Appeal warns that busy teams must have the staffing and resources to meet UPC deadlines
Gift this article