Why Brazil is important to a patent portfolio strategy

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Why Brazil is important to a patent portfolio strategy

Sponsored by

Licks_Brazil.png

Otto Licks and Rodrigo Maior of Licks Attorneys explains why Brazil is important to patent portfolio strategy

Brazil represents a pivotal market for patent owners, thanks to its extensive consumer base and well-established pro-patent system, providing a reliable and efficient means of acquisition and adjudication. Still, many patent owners overlook the country when building and enforcing patent portfolios.

In recent years, the Brazilian patent office has implemented several measures to combat backlog and expedite examination processes. As a result, the average examination time has significantly decreased to an average of 4.3 years The PPH and fast-track programs patents can be issued in under 18 months.

Standing at over 87%, the global allowance rate of the Brazilian PTO also places the country as a patent-friendly jurisdiction. In the past three years, 90% of telecom applications were granted, whereas the rate for life-sciences stood at above 70%, while the computer and electronics sectors experienced a rate surpassing 80%.

Brazil's patent kill-rate in post-grant oppositions stands at 16%, which is considerably lower than in other prominent jurisdictions. A closer examination of the data reveals even more promising figures within key technical sectors, as the subsequent chart illustrates. This evidence underscores Brazil's favorable environment for patent owners seeking to protect their intellectual property in a competitive global landscape. 

Área

KILL RATE IN POST GRANT OPPOSITIONS (2013-2023)

Agrochemicals

8.00%

Biotechnologies

25.00%

Petrochemicals

13.00%

Pharmaceuticals

13.00%

Telecommunications

0.00%

Brazilian courts have consistently exhibited a commitment to the enforcement of patent rights. This is evident in their reluctance to stay the effects of patents before or during litigation, as well as their firmness to secure due process of enforcement procedures concurrent with validity challenges. Statistical evidence further illuminates this trend, as over 90% of requests seeking to stay the effects of a patent before or during concurrent enforcement litigation are denied by federal judges.

Furthermore, Brazil's population of over 210 million and robust middle class provide strategic opportunities across a wide range of industries. Brazil is the largest telecommunications market in Latin America and the fifth-largest smartphone market globally, boasting over 143 million users. The country also ranks among the top 10 pharmaceutical markets worldwide and holds the largest automotive market in Latin America, ranking eighth globally. These thriving sectors, along with Brazil's booming agribusiness and oil & gas industries, present abundant opportunities for IP owners.

In addition, Brazil features an effective patent enforcement system that is marked by the broad accessibility of injunctions. Brazil presents no eBay-like limitations on injunctive relief, thus providing patent owners with a substantial degree of protection. Although patent owners may benefit from incorporating multiple patents into a single lawsuit, it is important to recognize that judges frequently allow enforcement based on a single patent and grant preliminary injunctions at the beginning of litigation, which further illustrates the efficiency of Brazil's intellectual property system.

Patent owners should strengthen their portfolios in Brazil, capitalizing on the vast market and favorable conditions offered by Brazil's patent office and judicial system. The Brazilian legal system has consistently enabled patent owners to achieve the results expected, surpassing even those achieved in traditional jurisdictions. However, patent owners who neglect Brazil when filing their strategic portfolios miss out on the benefits this jurisdiction has to offer and leave themselves vulnerable when their resources are needed most.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Gift this article