Major strides in the inclusivity of Copyright Law in Africa

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Major strides in the inclusivity of Copyright Law in Africa

Sponsored by

26VonSeidels.png

Zaheer Seedat of Von Seidels describes the recent developments in the inclusivity of Copyright Law in Africa

Copyright is a branch of Intellectual Property (IP) Law where legal inclusion for people with disabilities has seen developments in the past year. Many authored works lack accessibility for people with disabilities. This is due to the fact that certain copyright works cannot be comprehended or appreciated by people with certain disabilities. Copyright owners fail to be inclusive in the way that they express their works and the mediums thereof.

There is a need for the development of Copyright Law to be more inclusive of people with disabilities, especially when it comes to the adaptation of works in order to make it accessible for people with disabilities. To provide for this, the solution seems to be a limitation on the exclusive rights of the author to allow for the adaptation of the work to make it accessible for people with disabilities, obviously with the limitation that prevents commercial gain and exploitation from those making the adaptation.

The recent development of Copyright Law in Mozambique

The new Copyright Law of Mozambique, Law 9/2022 came into force on 26 September 2022. This new law revokes Law 4/2001 and provided a significant update on issues of copyright in Mozambique.

Article 9 of the new law has expanded the scope of works eligible for protection by stating that copyright belongs to the intellectual creator of the work and is recognised regardless of registration, filing or any other formality, apart from some cases specified in the law.

Further, the new law has made provision for the accessibility of people with disabilities by allowing for the unauthorised and free recreation, reproduction, distribution, importation or exportation of a lawfully published literary work into an accessible format for people with disabilities. Such adaptations can, however, not be commercialised. This is a great development in terms of the inclusivity of the law and follows in line with a recent court case in South Africa which followed a similar approach in the development of inclusivity in terms of Copyright Law.

Blind SA v Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition

In the case of Blind SA v Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition, the constitutionality of certain provisions of the Copyright Act 98 of 1978 in South Africa was challenged in the High Court and it was argued that the Act is not inclusive of provisions designed to ensure that persons with visual and print disabilities have accessibility to works under copyright. Blind SA argued in this matter by stating that this lack of accessibility was a violation of the rights of persons who are blind or visually impaired. This matter went unopposed, and the Constitutional Court confirmed on 21 September 2022 that sections 6 and 7, read with section 23 of the Copyright Act were unconstitutional, as these provisions limited the access to accessible format copies of published literary works and artistic works as included as part of literary works and was non-inclusive of people with disabilities as a result.

Paragraph 67 of the judgment, which reads that “[l]egislation that protects the rights of copyright owners must take account of the differential impacts of such protection upon different classes of persons”, sets a good precedent that all countries should aim to develop their copyright laws to be more inclusive of people with disabilities.

These developments in Mozambique and South Africa are a good sign for the future and we believe that it is every state’s obligation to enact copyright legislation that allows for the protection and commercialisation of copyrightable works while also allowing room for the adaptation of such works, at no commercial gain, in order to cater for works in formats that are accessible to persons with disabilities.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Peter Ling of Lenz & Staehelin in Zurich discusses trends in patent litigation, the regulation of AI and the benefits of teaching IP
Brandsmiths and Powell Gilbert will contest claims over several UK trademarks in a High Court case examining the ownership and revival of a heritage brand
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is taking a fresh strategic approach to pricing in its AI strategy. It could amplify calls for law firms to ditch the billable hour
Charles Harding plans to build a new team around life sciences oppositions and contentious work, drawing on his three decades developing a practice from scratch at D Young & Co
The firm reveals how its litigation strategies informed the arguments that took Masimo’s judgment past $818 million
The firm was rebuilding its IP practice through a string of patent hires and a Texas expansion, but its dissolution has put the newly built talent back into the market
AI can exploit longstanding gaps in copyright protection at remarkable speed, but EU law still provides tools to fight back, says Simon Hembt at Bird & Bird
The firm has tapped a local patent trio to establish a foothold in the market and broaden its national presence
New Asia-Pacific IP head Jonathan Chu is eyeing opportunities arising from Chinese technology licensing, overseas enforcement and increasingly IP-heavy cross-border deals
Europe’s largest intellectual property convention and trade fair is back: IP Service World 2026 takes place in Munich from November 23–25 – the 16th edition, with 1,400-plus attendees from 55-plus nations, 100-plus speakers, and 100-plus exhibitors. Three days. Two focused areas. One IP marketplace.
Gift this article