Vietnam: Additional guidelines for examining computer programmes

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Vietnam: Additional guidelines for examining computer programmes

Sponsored by

26INVESTIP_Vietnam.png

Nguyen Duc Thang of INVESTIP writes about the recent patent examination guidelines for computer programmes

Like many other countries, in Vietnam, pure computer programmes are not patentable but rather protected by the copyright law. However, certain computer programmes are still eligible for patent protection.

The examination of computer programmes is guided by Article 5.8.2.5 of the Vietnam Guidelines for Patent Examination (Guidelines). To supplement the provisions, the Intellectual Property Office of Vietnam recently published Annex I which contains additional guidelines.

The additional guidelines are not for the assessment of novelty and inventive step; they are aimed at the assessment of patentable subject-matter to see whether the subject-matter is excluded from patent protection as below.

 

The assessment of patentable subject-matter in formalities examination stage

In Vietnam, invention is defined as a technical solution in the form of a product or a process, and as a result, an invention must have technical features. Therefore, if the examiner finds that the claimed subject-matter does not comprise technical features, such as the presence of hardware, the patent application will be refused.

Article 5.8.2.5 lists a number of claim preambles which are not permissible. The additional guidelines in the Annex are to be added to the Article, and therefore they have to be consistent with the Article. If there are technical features, as mentioned above, but the preambles of the claims are "computer programme", "computer programme product", etc, the examiner will still refuse the application.

In case the application passes the two tests, the examination of patentable subject-matter issue will be conducted further in the substantive examination stage.

 

The assessment of patentable subject-matter in substantive examination stage

The examiner will consider whether the claimed subject-matter has a technical character, producing a further technical effect that is a technical effect going beyond the "normal" physical interactions between the programme (software) and the computer (hardware) on which it is run. If not, the application will still be refused because the subject-matter is not considered to be a patentable subject-matter.

Technical characters are quite diverse and Annex I provides guidelines for assessing a technical character for computer programmes, including:

i. Information modelling, activity of programming and programming languages

ii. Data retrieval, formats and structures

iii. Database management systems and information retrieval

The Annex also provides guidelines to consider a technical character for computer programmes where they relate to the following matters:

1. Performing mathematical methods

2. Artificial intelligence and machine learning

3. Simulation, design or modelling

4. Performing schemes, rules and methods for playing games

5. Performing methods for doing business

6. Presentations of information

7. User interfaces

Accordingly, there may be other guidelines for these seven matters, but where they relate to a computer programme, like the use of a computer programme to perform them, then the guidelines provided in Annex I will be applied.

These guidelines on the technical character are somewhat similar to the relevant guidelines of the European Patent Office.

We are preparing an English translation of this Annex and will soon post the translation on our website at https://investip.vn/news-insights/

Should you require any further information or assistance, please contact us at patent@investip.vn

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Armstrong Teasdale’s Jim Heinen Jr discusses the challenge of balancing billables, business development and family life and explains why not all patent lawyers are science nerds
From cross-border jurisdiction to the end of the transitional period, Powell Gilbert’s Ioana Sabau and Bryce Matthewson predict the biggest talking points ahead
A wave of office launches and lateral hires reflect the draw of patent disputes, but booming AI, semiconductor and data centre markets are offering an even bigger IP opportunity
The hire of Frederick Nicolle as a partner continues Pinsent Masons' expansion while reducing Simmons’ patent prosecution offering in London to zero
The expansion into Granada forms part of a national ‘decentralisation’ strategy focused on providing proximity to research and tech businesses away from traditional hubs
Three successive wins have got the firm eyeing additional opportunities as ITC work booms
While many firms remain focused on generative AI, recent hires and practice launches suggest the next battle may be for lawyers who understand how AI is moving into the physical world
The explosion of data centres has prompted patent pool operators to create new licensing opportunities
The court struck out copyright claims brought by Ladbrokes owner Entain, saying that ownership details should have been completed before litigation began
Düsseldorf has overtaken Munich as the UPC's busiest division, while firms including Winston Taylor, Clifford Chance, and Hoyng Rokh Monegier featured in disputes involving Abbott, Essity, Amazon and Hurom
Gift this article