Vietnam: Additional guidelines for examining computer programmes

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Vietnam: Additional guidelines for examining computer programmes

Sponsored by

INVESTIP

Nguyen Duc Thang of INVESTIP writes about the recent patent examination guidelines for computer programmes

Like many other countries, in Vietnam, pure computer programmes are not patentable but rather protected by the copyright law. However, certain computer programmes are still eligible for patent protection.

The examination of computer programmes is guided by Article 5.8.2.5 of the Vietnam Guidelines for Patent Examination (Guidelines). To supplement the provisions, the Intellectual Property Office of Vietnam recently published Annex I which contains additional guidelines.

The additional guidelines are not for the assessment of novelty and inventive step; they are aimed at the assessment of patentable subject-matter to see whether the subject-matter is excluded from patent protection as below.

 

The assessment of patentable subject-matter in formalities examination stage

In Vietnam, invention is defined as a technical solution in the form of a product or a process, and as a result, an invention must have technical features. Therefore, if the examiner finds that the claimed subject-matter does not comprise technical features, such as the presence of hardware, the patent application will be refused.

Article 5.8.2.5 lists a number of claim preambles which are not permissible. The additional guidelines in the Annex are to be added to the Article, and therefore they have to be consistent with the Article. If there are technical features, as mentioned above, but the preambles of the claims are "computer programme", "computer programme product", etc, the examiner will still refuse the application.

In case the application passes the two tests, the examination of patentable subject-matter issue will be conducted further in the substantive examination stage.

 

The assessment of patentable subject-matter in substantive examination stage

The examiner will consider whether the claimed subject-matter has a technical character, producing a further technical effect that is a technical effect going beyond the "normal" physical interactions between the programme (software) and the computer (hardware) on which it is run. If not, the application will still be refused because the subject-matter is not considered to be a patentable subject-matter.

Technical characters are quite diverse and Annex I provides guidelines for assessing a technical character for computer programmes, including:

i. Information modelling, activity of programming and programming languages

ii. Data retrieval, formats and structures

iii. Database management systems and information retrieval

The Annex also provides guidelines to consider a technical character for computer programmes where they relate to the following matters:

1. Performing mathematical methods

2. Artificial intelligence and machine learning

3. Simulation, design or modelling

4. Performing schemes, rules and methods for playing games

5. Performing methods for doing business

6. Presentations of information

7. User interfaces

Accordingly, there may be other guidelines for these seven matters, but where they relate to a computer programme, like the use of a computer programme to perform them, then the guidelines provided in Annex I will be applied.

These guidelines on the technical character are somewhat similar to the relevant guidelines of the European Patent Office.

We are preparing an English translation of this Annex and will soon post the translation on our website at https://investip.vn/news-insights/

Should you require any further information or assistance, please contact us at patent@investip.vn

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Rebekah Gay discusses overcoming self-doubt, supporting the next generation of women lawyers, and how changing client demands are reshaping IP practice
New filing data suggests Germany's grip on UPC litigation remains strong, while Bardehle Pagenberg, Arnold Ruess, Hogan Lovells and Carpmaels notch up notable cases
In 27 years, KASS has expanded to seven countries in southeast Asia and is now eyeing further growth opportunities. Its CEO shares her perspective
Mine Güner discusses bridging law and business, taking the initiative, and why Taylor Swift helped put copyright on the map
Cindy Goh discusses why she launched Cheang & Ariff's IP department, the improving litigation environment in Malaysia and what to consider when using AI
Increased focus on adding patent litigation depth to the firm’s Dallas office was behind the boutique’s most recent hires
IPH's Canadian acquisitions are paying off on paper, but a couple of strong years may not be enough to show that the group's strategy has truly won over the market
Examiner statistics could help patent prosecution practitioners tailor strategies, turning an area of high variability into a potential competitive advantage
The England and Wales High Court’s ruling in Accord v Novartis may not rewrite the law on plausibility, but it does signal a pragmatic approach that could provide greater certainty for life sciences innovators
Firms with established sports relationships and specialised expertise are well positioned to capture the market’s expanded pool of IP work
Gift this article