Vietnam: Additional guidelines for examining computer programmes

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Vietnam: Additional guidelines for examining computer programmes

Sponsored by

26INVESTIP_Vietnam.png

Nguyen Duc Thang of INVESTIP writes about the recent patent examination guidelines for computer programmes

Like many other countries, in Vietnam, pure computer programmes are not patentable but rather protected by the copyright law. However, certain computer programmes are still eligible for patent protection.

The examination of computer programmes is guided by Article 5.8.2.5 of the Vietnam Guidelines for Patent Examination (Guidelines). To supplement the provisions, the Intellectual Property Office of Vietnam recently published Annex I which contains additional guidelines.

The additional guidelines are not for the assessment of novelty and inventive step; they are aimed at the assessment of patentable subject-matter to see whether the subject-matter is excluded from patent protection as below.

 

The assessment of patentable subject-matter in formalities examination stage

In Vietnam, invention is defined as a technical solution in the form of a product or a process, and as a result, an invention must have technical features. Therefore, if the examiner finds that the claimed subject-matter does not comprise technical features, such as the presence of hardware, the patent application will be refused.

Article 5.8.2.5 lists a number of claim preambles which are not permissible. The additional guidelines in the Annex are to be added to the Article, and therefore they have to be consistent with the Article. If there are technical features, as mentioned above, but the preambles of the claims are "computer programme", "computer programme product", etc, the examiner will still refuse the application.

In case the application passes the two tests, the examination of patentable subject-matter issue will be conducted further in the substantive examination stage.

 

The assessment of patentable subject-matter in substantive examination stage

The examiner will consider whether the claimed subject-matter has a technical character, producing a further technical effect that is a technical effect going beyond the "normal" physical interactions between the programme (software) and the computer (hardware) on which it is run. If not, the application will still be refused because the subject-matter is not considered to be a patentable subject-matter.

Technical characters are quite diverse and Annex I provides guidelines for assessing a technical character for computer programmes, including:

i. Information modelling, activity of programming and programming languages

ii. Data retrieval, formats and structures

iii. Database management systems and information retrieval

The Annex also provides guidelines to consider a technical character for computer programmes where they relate to the following matters:

1. Performing mathematical methods

2. Artificial intelligence and machine learning

3. Simulation, design or modelling

4. Performing schemes, rules and methods for playing games

5. Performing methods for doing business

6. Presentations of information

7. User interfaces

Accordingly, there may be other guidelines for these seven matters, but where they relate to a computer programme, like the use of a computer programme to perform them, then the guidelines provided in Annex I will be applied.

These guidelines on the technical character are somewhat similar to the relevant guidelines of the European Patent Office.

We are preparing an English translation of this Annex and will soon post the translation on our website at https://investip.vn/news-insights/

Should you require any further information or assistance, please contact us at patent@investip.vn

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The firm launched a San Diego office earlier this month, but California investment and expansion is far from complete
The industry’s response to AI requires an unfamiliar ingredient as firms battle to shape their futures
The firm is looking beyond replacing recently departed talent, betting instead on senior leaders to strengthen and expand its patent litigation platform
Olga Partington, director in Sterne Kessler’s biotechnology and chemical practice group, shares why a patent's vulnerability peaks when it is young, rather than when it is most valuable, under the PTAB's new framework
IP experts gathered in San Francisco last week to discuss the changing global SEP landscape and new licensing models for AI infrastructure
SKW Schwarz partner Daniel Kendziur explains how new green claims rules are changing his workload and bringing him into direct contact with marketing, PR and government affairs teams
The government is targeting earlier resolution of SEP disputes while ruling out a standalone IPEC rate determination track and restrictions on injunctions
Ana Castedo, who brings a strong focus on patent litigation, will help build the firm’s IP litigation offering in Madrid
A former scientist, inventor and now a patent practice leader, Hanane Fathi Roswall shares her views on leadership, diversity, the rise of AI and the promise of the UPC
With rumours that a third IP judge could yet join the England and Wales High Court, we run through some potential names while practitioners outline the importance of a well-stocked bench
Gift this article