USA: Mortgage Application Technologies v Meridianlink

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

USA: Mortgage Application Technologies v Meridianlink

Sponsored by

25HuschBlackwell.png

Husch Blackwell reports on its victory on behalf of Meridianlink, the third time in the last couple of years that Rudy Telscher has led a trial team to victory on Alice grounds

Husch Blackwell successfully defended client Meridianlink, Inc. against a claim of patent infringement brought by Mortgage Application Technologies, LLC (MAT) in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The court granted Meridianlink’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, finding MAT’s asserted patent to be invalid and dismissing the matter without leave to amend.

The dispute involved a patent issued to MAT in 2013 that relates to online mortgage loan origination services, and MAT argued that Meridianlink had infringed the patent by offering its competitive automated loan origination service. MAT filed its lawsuit in January 2019.

Led by Rudy Telscher, Kara Fussner, and Steve Howe, the Husch Blackwell team mounted an invalidity defense that relied on the abstract-idea exception to 35 U.S.C. § 101 that was articulated by the U.S. Supreme Court in Alice Corp v CLS Bank in 2014. The Alice decision set forth a two-part test that patents have to pass to survive an invalidity challenge and raised the legal standard by which patents could be directed toward concepts generally thought to be ineligible for patent protection, such as laws of nature, natural phenomena, and abstract ideas.

Ultimately, the court determined that MAT’s patent was not directed to patent-eligible concepts, holding that its claims “do not speak to any improvement in technological functioning” and that they merely “recite steps that can all be performed in the human mind.” Additionally, the court agreed with the Husch Blackwell team’s argument that the claims “both individually and in combination, do not add anything ‘significantly more’ to the abstract concept itself,” and thus fail to pass the crucial second step of the Alice test.

“Since the Supreme Court devised its Alice test, our team has used it successfully to invalidate bad patents,” said Telscher. “This case is the latest example of why defendants in patent litigation need to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the asserted patents. Some patents, like MAT’s ‘902 patent, should have never been issued because they attempt to cover the use of generic computer concepts to automate an age-old practice – here, the loan origination process.”

The victory on behalf of Meridianlink represents the third time in the last couple of years that Telscher has led a trial team to victory on Alice grounds.

The Husch Blackwell team also included partner Daisy Manning and paralegals Lauren Hitchens and Anna Florian.

 

The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s). This article is for general information purposes only and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice or guidance.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Mehmet Gün and Uğur Aktekin discuss four decades of change in Türkiye’s legal market, the firm’s commitment to independence and the challenge of building an institution that can outlast its founders
Boehringer Ingelheim has instructed a team from Kirkland, while Teva is being represented by Pinsent Masons
The Delhi High Court’s latest directions offer an opportunity to move beyond remedies against bad-faith registrations and address how suspicious applications are identified in the first place, says Fatima Baig at Lexlinc
Camilla Hamrin describes how the acquisition by Acapo Onsagers will impact Bergenstråhle’s trademark practice – and reflects on changes she has seen over 30 years in IP
On a recent trip to the French capital, we learned that the UPC is squeezing domestic litigation while firms are chasing senior talent, experimenting with AI and considering new ways of organising their practices
Daniel Law says a string of lateral hires and broader expansion plans will strengthen its position to capitalise on Brazil’s burgeoning IP and patent litigation market
Jason Raeburn’s arrival will expand the firm’s London footprint in AI, copyright and tech disputes
The firm is shaping its AI strategy around partnerships with Harvey and Legora alongside internally developed tools from its legal technology company, Eltemate
A dispute Down Under shows why trademark lawyers cannot afford to wait on the sidelines when a rival brand gathers momentum
The Third Circuit’s decision in Thomson Reuters v ROSS marks the first appellate-level decision addressing AI and fair use, prompting copyright counsel to consider arguments around potential licensing markets
Gift this article