USA: Mortgage Application Technologies v Meridianlink

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

USA: Mortgage Application Technologies v Meridianlink

Sponsored by

25HuschBlackwell.png

Husch Blackwell reports on its victory on behalf of Meridianlink, the third time in the last couple of years that Rudy Telscher has led a trial team to victory on Alice grounds

Husch Blackwell successfully defended client Meridianlink, Inc. against a claim of patent infringement brought by Mortgage Application Technologies, LLC (MAT) in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The court granted Meridianlink’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, finding MAT’s asserted patent to be invalid and dismissing the matter without leave to amend.

The dispute involved a patent issued to MAT in 2013 that relates to online mortgage loan origination services, and MAT argued that Meridianlink had infringed the patent by offering its competitive automated loan origination service. MAT filed its lawsuit in January 2019.

Led by Rudy Telscher, Kara Fussner, and Steve Howe, the Husch Blackwell team mounted an invalidity defense that relied on the abstract-idea exception to 35 U.S.C. § 101 that was articulated by the U.S. Supreme Court in Alice Corp v CLS Bank in 2014. The Alice decision set forth a two-part test that patents have to pass to survive an invalidity challenge and raised the legal standard by which patents could be directed toward concepts generally thought to be ineligible for patent protection, such as laws of nature, natural phenomena, and abstract ideas.

Ultimately, the court determined that MAT’s patent was not directed to patent-eligible concepts, holding that its claims “do not speak to any improvement in technological functioning” and that they merely “recite steps that can all be performed in the human mind.” Additionally, the court agreed with the Husch Blackwell team’s argument that the claims “both individually and in combination, do not add anything ‘significantly more’ to the abstract concept itself,” and thus fail to pass the crucial second step of the Alice test.

“Since the Supreme Court devised its Alice test, our team has used it successfully to invalidate bad patents,” said Telscher. “This case is the latest example of why defendants in patent litigation need to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the asserted patents. Some patents, like MAT’s ‘902 patent, should have never been issued because they attempt to cover the use of generic computer concepts to automate an age-old practice – here, the loan origination process.”

The victory on behalf of Meridianlink represents the third time in the last couple of years that Telscher has led a trial team to victory on Alice grounds.

The Husch Blackwell team also included partner Daisy Manning and paralegals Lauren Hitchens and Anna Florian.

 

The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s). This article is for general information purposes only and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice or guidance.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Fresh off a string of ITC victories, Latham has recruited Baker Botts’ ITC leader Lisa Kattan, adding another prominent name to one of the market's busiest ITC practices
The firm hopes its recent Düsseldorf expansion and UK partner hire will strengthen its offering as it looks to an integrated model to boost UPC capabilities
Stephenson Harwood’s trademark prosecution push and patent ambitions could complement Taylor Wessing’s remaining but depleted European IP strength following its UK arm’s departure
Gerben IP’s first woman partner, Sophie Edbrooke, explains how boutique life allowed her to broaden her expertise, take on leadership responsibilities and carve out a route to the top
INTA has a right to protect its Annual Meeting, but making it harder for others to hold similar events risks leaving delegates with a bigger travel bill
The firm says it hopes to capture patent litigation work in Texas by arming itself with experienced trial lawyers with venue expertise
Ken Iijima's arrival continues a trend of ex-Pizzeys practitioners joining RnB IP, whose co-founder says independent ownership and a lucrative compensation model have become attractive in a consolidating market
McDermott Will & Schulte lawyers explore why the UPC is seeing rapid adoption by medtech for fast-moving disputes, while pharma and biotech take a cautious, selective approach over revocation risks
IP firms may be growing more comfortable with external capital, but uncertainty over who could ultimately own the business is complicating the investment pitch
The former Western District of Texas judge addresses perceptions of his courtroom, reveals what comes next as he returns to practice at A&O Shearman and explains why marathon running is ‘cathartic’
Gift this article