Managing IP research and publication timeline

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Managing IP research and publication timeline

Sponsored by

Managing IP

Read about our research and results publication timeline

Please note that our research and results publication dates below are subject to change each year.

We will publish an announcement on this website when research results are available. Follow our updates on the news and features page.

Research timeline

August: We will send out an email with details about our research for the next edition

September 1: We start accepting firm submissions, conducting independent research and scheduling market interviews

October 31: Firm questionnaire and client referees submission deadline*

October - December: Research interviews

December - March: Client referee feedback and practitioner survey starts**

May: Rising Stars survey***

July: End of the research for the current year's edition

* Any deadline that falls on a Saturday or Sunday is automatically extended to Monday.

** We can contact referees at any time between December and March, and we'll first process documents submitted on time, i.e. between September 1 and October 31. Our emails are sent from our general research email address (see here) or the email address of one of our editors. Our first practitioner survey is for the senior IP practitioners, especially the IP Stars. Any IP partner can complete our IP Practitioner Survey.

***We launch our Rising Stars survey after we have closed the senior IP practitioner survey. Any IP practitioner who can meet the criteria for the Rising Stars list can participate in the survey.

 

Please also read the information on the following pages:

Methodology

FAQ

Research forms and surveys

Submission guidelines



Rankings publication

Normally, we start publishing the rankings for the year in March, though this is subject to change. Please read the latest updates on the news and features page.

 

The Managing IP Awards

The winners and shortlists for the annual Managing IP Awards programme are published on managingip.com. Read about the awards and the previous winners here.

Our marketing/business development team will inform firms and individuals about the IP STARS rankings and Managing IP Awards.

Keep up to date with our research and results publication by following us on social media (Twitter and LinkedIn) and regularly checking our news page (here). You can also sign up to receive our newsletter.

 

Firm reviews

We start publishing or updating reviews from 30 September, after all the rankings for the year have been released.

Firms can contact us here if there is an urgent need to update certain information, especially practitioner names, sooner rather than later.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Rebekah Gay discusses overcoming self-doubt, supporting the next generation of women lawyers, and how changing client demands are reshaping IP practice
New filing data suggests Germany's grip on UPC litigation remains strong, while Bardehle Pagenberg, Arnold Ruess, Hogan Lovells and Carpmaels notch up notable cases
In 27 years, KASS has expanded to seven countries in southeast Asia and is now eyeing further growth opportunities. Its CEO shares her perspective
Mine Güner discusses bridging law and business, taking the initiative, and why Taylor Swift helped put copyright on the map
Cindy Goh discusses why she launched Cheang & Ariff's IP department, the improving litigation environment in Malaysia and what to consider when using AI
Increased focus on adding patent litigation depth to the firm’s Dallas office was behind the boutique’s most recent hires
IPH's Canadian acquisitions are paying off on paper, but a couple of strong years may not be enough to show that the group's strategy has truly won over the market
Examiner statistics could help patent prosecution practitioners tailor strategies, turning an area of high variability into a potential competitive advantage
The England and Wales High Court’s ruling in Accord v Novartis may not rewrite the law on plausibility, but it does signal a pragmatic approach that could provide greater certainty for life sciences innovators
Firms with established sports relationships and specialised expertise are well positioned to capture the market’s expanded pool of IP work
Gift this article