The Indian pet food industry’s legal bite: trends, regulations, and IP hurdles

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

The Indian pet food industry’s legal bite: trends, regulations, and IP hurdles

Sponsored by

rna-400px.jpg
pexels-rubenstein111rebello-8121142.jpg

India’s rapidly expanding pet food industry presents several intellectual property challenges. Ranjan Narula and Shipra Alisha Philip of RNA, Technology and IP Attorneys explore the landscape and provide insights into strategies for market players

The Indian pet food industry has grown significantly, driven by rising pet ownership, the advancement of pet humanisation, higher disposable incomes, and greater awareness of pet nutrition. According to the India Pet Food Market report (2020-2030F), the market was valued at $843.89 million in 2024 and is projected to reach $1.98 billion by 2030. This article explores key industry trends, the regulatory frameworks, intellectual property (IP) challenges, and possible solutions.

Recent trends in the Indian pet food industry

The following trends are currently prominent in the Indian pet food industry:

  • A shift from home-cooked food to packaged food;

  • Premiumisation – there is an increasing demand for organic, grain-free, and breed-specific diets;

  • A rise of domestic brands – indigenous manufacturers offer innovative, cost-effective alternatives to imports;

  • E-commerce and direct-to-consumer expansion – online platforms provide greater accessibility, with specialised retailers and vet clinics enhancing product offerings;

  • Functional and health-focused diets – there is a growing demand for pet food enriched with probiotics, supplements, and therapeutic formulations;

  • Sustainable practices – pet owners generally favour eco-friendly packaging and sustainably sourced ingredients; and

  • Evolving pet demographics – while dog ownership remains dominant, cat adoption is surging (an 88.2% increase from 2017–22) due to urban living preferences.

Regulatory framework governing pet food in India

The pet food industry is governed by the following laws and regulations:

IP challenges faced by pet food companies – and possible solutions

Brand conflicts and trademark/trade dress infringement

Pet food companies often face conflicts when their trademarks resemble existing brands. Competitors may imitate packaging, colours, or product presentation to mislead consumers. Before launching, businesses should conduct comprehensive clearance searches on the Indian Trade Marks Registry, domain name registries, and e-commerce platforms to avoid infringement lawsuits and rebranding or redesigning costs.

Companies should register trademarks early, ensuring easier enforcement against third-party infringers. While unregistered trademarks hold common law protection, registered trademarks provide a legal presumption of ownership, simplifying enforcement. Additionally, trademark registration aids in preventing counterfeits, as customs authorities can seize infringing goods at import-export.

Patent disputes and trade secret disclosures

Patent disputes and trade secret disclosures are rising in the competitive pet food industry, driven by innovations in formulations and processes targeting health issues such as digestion and obesity.

To protect IP, companies can register patents, use non-disclosure agreements with partners, and enforce non-compete clauses to prevent employee knowledge sharing. While regulations may require ingredient transparency, companies can safeguard proprietary formulas by offering broad descriptions and focusing on brand differentiation rather than detailed disclosures.

Counterfeiting

Fake products can damage brand reputation and pose health risks for pets. Solutions include using serialisation, embedded micro-holes, microtext, UV and infrared inks, synthetic tagging, highly secure QR codes, or blockchain for product authentication. To monitor counterfeit pet foods, regular market surveys help to trace their origin. Once identified, trademark owners can seek an ex parte injunction to seize fake products. If the counterfeiter is hard to identify or operates from temporary locations, John Doe orders can be obtained for further action.

To prevent counterfeit imports in India, IP owners can register their trademarks with the customs authority under the Intellectual Property Rights (Imported Goods) Enforcement Rules, 2007 and the Customs Act, 1962, which enables the inspection and seizure of counterfeit goods at the border.

Counterfeiting on e-marketplaces is common due to the lack of physical inspections. When counterfeit pet food listings are found, brand owners should issue take-down notices. E-marketplaces, as intermediaries under the IT Act, must exercise due diligence by ensuring sellers do not infringe IP rights. Some platforms, such as Amazon, offer anti-counterfeiting measures, including brand registry programs for trademark owners to remove violations.

India’s pet food industry thrives on innovation, but strong IP protection and regulatory compliance are essential. Balancing these elements will drive sustainable growth.

Fraudulent websites

There has been an increase in fraudulent websites having similar domain names, layouts, and look-and-feel to the websites of legitimate pet food brands. A domain name complaint can help to have such fraudulent domains cancelled or transferred to the rightful owner. Complaints can be filed under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy for global domains or the .IN Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy for India, offering a non-litigation arbitration process.

Unauthorised sale of original goods and parallel imports

Parallel imports, or grey market goods, are genuine products imported without the IP owner’s permission. In India, the courts have allowed parallel imports, and IP rights are exhausted once products are sold. However, brand owners can restrict unauthorised sales if product quality or after-sales service is compromised.

The brand owners can rely upon the provisions of the Pet Food Products of Animal Origin (Import into India) Order, 2008 to stop unauthorised importations. Monitoring discrepancies in refund/return policies, packaging, advertising/promotional methods, quality control, pricing and presentation, removal of codes, and other aspects can help to prevent such sales.

Product disparagement

Product disparagement often arises from comparative advertising. While such advertising is allowed, it must not mislead, unfairly disadvantage competitors, or violate honest trade practices under Section 30 (1) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Brand owners must ensure advertisements do not disparage competitors, especially when agencies unknowingly use competitor products or fail to follow proper measures, leading to legal issues. Careful advertisement design should emphasise product differences without disparaging competitors.

Geographic IP protection and international challenges

IP laws vary across countries, making enforcement difficult. Companies should register their IP assets in key markets such as India that hold high growth potential, and work with legal experts to navigate region-specific IP regulations.

The outlook for the Indian pet food industry


The pet food industry has huge growth potential in India, with increased pet ownership, the humanisation of pets, and advancements in veterinary care among the factors driving the industry. With innovation in tech-driven solutions that monitor a pet’s health, and a movement to sustainable pet foods made from alternative proteins, there is no shortage of groundbreaking ideas that could shape the future.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The Dutch division is cementing its position as the UPC's primary alternative to Germany, with a consistent share of filings and growing market influence
Angela Dunning shares why it’s an exciting time to be practising at the intersection of AI and IP, where the law is actively being made
Junior lawyers aren’t unwilling to work hard, as some seniors believe; rather, they are rejecting traditional career advancement models that have limited payoff
Rebekah Gay discusses overcoming self-doubt, supporting the next generation of women lawyers, and how changing client demands are reshaping IP practice
New filing data suggests Germany's grip on UPC litigation remains strong, while Bardehle Pagenberg, Arnold Ruess, Hogan Lovells and Carpmaels notch up notable cases
In 27 years, KASS has expanded to seven countries in southeast Asia and is now eyeing further growth opportunities. Its CEO shares her perspective
Mine Güner discusses bridging law and business, taking the initiative, and why Taylor Swift helped put copyright on the map
Cindy Goh discusses why she launched Cheang & Ariff's IP department, the improving litigation environment in Malaysia and what to consider when using AI
Increased focus on adding patent litigation depth to the firm’s Dallas office was behind the boutique’s most recent hires
IPH's Canadian acquisitions are paying off on paper, but a couple of strong years may not be enough to show that the group's strategy has truly won over the market
Gift this article