Philippines to introduce patent agent exams

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Philippines to introduce patent agent exams

The Intellectual Property Office (IPOPhil) and the EC-ASEAN Cooperation Programme (ECAP II) held a five-day Patent Application Drafting and Prosecution seminar from October 10 to 15, which was conducted by Karl Rackette, a European and German patent attorney. At the seminar, IPOPhil distributed a draft regulation aimed at introducing a qualifying examination for patent agents. At the moment, there is no formal patent attorney or patent agent profession in the Philippines. Patent applications are handled by lawyers with assistance from people with technical knowledge, many of whom are former IPOPhil patent examiners. The objective of the proposed regulation is to develop a patent agent profession in the country. The main points of the proposal are as follows:

  • Examinations will be held when IPOPhil considers it convenient, but the period between two examinations should not exceed 36 months;

  • The examination will be organized and conducted by a board made up of three members who will appoint an examination committee;

  • Candidates must hold a bachelor's degree or post graduate degree in either chemistry, electronics and communication, mechanics, civil or genetic engineering, biology, biochemistry, microbiology, molecular biology, medicine or any allied medical course, pharmacy, physics, or any other existing or emerging technical field approved by the director-general;

  • The examination will establish whether a candidate is able to write a patent application and to amend it under the law of the Philippines, the PCT rules and the IPOPhil manual of substantive examination;

  • The examination will be in English;

  • The first examination will be administered by two experts from the European Patent Office who will conduct a five-day seminar beforehand.

  • The seminar and the examination will be open to IPOPhil patent examiners and former patent examiners who have at least four years of substantive examining work experience. Candidates that hold one of the degrees listed above will also be eligible to take it.

The regulation does not address whether qualifying lawyers that have been handling patent applications will be eligible to sit the examination. This issue is likely to be raised with the authorities.

hechanova-julaug05.jpg

Editha R Hechanova

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The Pizzeys-Griffith Hack integration was designed to create a stronger Australian IP platform but with several ex-Pizzeys principals now gone, the deal's success may depend on where clients place their trust
Thomas Lonsdale and Hsu Min Chung of HGF explore the practical impact of the EPO’s Enlarged Board of Appeal’s decision in G1/25 and its interplay with G1/24
The firm’s recent IP hire and launch of a new robotics industry group signal an effort to capture work emerging from AI entering the physical world
Another firm sets up shop in Dallas, bringing its patent disputes capabilities to one of the US’s busiest litigation venues
Entrepreneurial IP lawyers are still launching specialist firms, but increasingly with larger teams, broader coverage and greater infrastructure than the boutique model once implied
Jevon Louis explains how Covid led to a focus on local clients, discusses why mediation is successful in Singapore and reflects on the growing demand for AI advice
An increase in instructions from domestic companies and litigation for international clients are driving success for the Chinese IP firm, according to two lead partners
Ankur Sangal said he wants his team, nearly 30-strong already, to respond to a growing demand for specialist, commercially focused IP advice in a ‘rapidly evolving’ Indian market
As AI adoption accelerates across corporate IP departments, Simon Webster, president of IP at Clarivate, argues that success will depend less on technology alone and more on data quality, workflow design, and organisational readiness
After months of speculation over his next move, former Texas patent judge Alan Albright has found a new home at the firm’s Austin office
Gift this article