First smell mark registered

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

First smell mark registered

Argentine Trademark Law protects both products and service marks. Under the Law, the ownership of a trade mark and the right to the exclusive use thereof are acquired by registration in accordance with Section 4 of Law 22,362 (trade mark law), which has adopted the attributive system. Consequently, if there is no registry of a trade mark, there is no right thereto.

However, legislation and court decisions have granted special protection to notorious trade marks that had not been previously registered in Argentina. A trade mark consists in any distinctive sign, symbol, or device affixed by a manufacturer to the goods he produces, or used in connection with the services rendered, with the purpose of identifying such goods or services in the market. Determining whether a trade mark applies for trade mark protection depends upon its distinctive capability. Before registration, the trade mark is subject to an examination carried out by the Trademark Office examiners.

The Argentine trade mark law does not expressly refer to the registration of so-called smell trade marks (certain fragrances, smells or scents). If a product's packaging includes a distinctive scent, the owner will logically try to obtain the exclusive right to that scent. Naturally, the appropriate way of obtaining such exclusivity is by means of the trade mark registration of such scent. Since the Argentine trade mark law adopts a wide criterion when referring to possible distinctive signs, many authors support the registration of smell signs.

On January 30 2009, the Argentine Trademark Office for the first time registered a smell mark to be applied to the container of a product in Argentina. They were recorded as: 2.115.161/ 62/63/64/65 to 2.115.166 issued as numbers 2.270.653/54/55/56 to 2.270.657, respectively. The owner of these trade marks is L'Oreal, and they are all registered in International Class 3. They were granted by Resolution M Nº 131/09. In all cases, they comprise a "... Fragrance of... (different fruits in each case)... applied to the Containers ...".

aulmann-juan-martin.jpg

 

zuccherino-daniel.jpg

Juan Martín Aulmann and Daniel R Zuccherino


Obligado & Cia

Paraguay 610, 17th Floor

C1057AAH, Buenos Aires

Argentina

Tel: +54 11 4114 1100

Fax: +54 11 4311 5675

admin@obligado.com.ar

www.obligado.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The expansion into Granada forms part of a national ‘decentralisation’ strategy focused on providing proximity to research and tech businesses away from traditional hubs
Three successive wins have got the firm eyeing additional opportunities as ITC work booms
While many firms remain focused on generative AI, recent hires and practice launches suggest the next battle may be for lawyers who understand how AI is moving into the physical world
The explosion of data centres has prompted patent pool operators to create new licensing opportunities
The court struck out copyright claims brought by Ladbrokes owner Entain, saying that ownership details should have been completed before litigation began
Düsseldorf has overtaken Munich as the UPC's busiest division, while firms including Winston Taylor, Clifford Chance, and Hoyng Rokh Monegier featured in disputes involving Abbott, Essity, Amazon and Hurom
The managing partner gave up an equity partnership track in New York to build a practice in India. More than a decade later, she discusses entrepreneurship, leadership, and why women should not wait before taking the next step
Vice presidents Shinya Jitsuhiro and Hirohisa Suzuki discuss litigation trends in Japan, recruitment challenges and clients’ international expansion
IP boutique Petillion represented IKEA in the dispute, which concerned the use of the multinational’s trademarks in an immigration-focused campaign. The firm tells Managing IP how it secured the outcome
The Pizzeys-Griffith Hack integration was designed to create a stronger Australian IP platform but with several ex-Pizzeys principals now gone, the deal's success may depend on where clients place their trust
Gift this article