New speedy procedure in IP appeals

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New speedy procedure in IP appeals

Following the practice of speedy proceedings and decisions in IP cases before the Dutch courts at first instance, the Court of Appeal in The Hague has recently announced that from September 1 2012 they will introduce a shortened procedure as alternative to the normal appeal. One of the prerequisites in such a procedure is that both parties agree to it and stick to its indicated timelines.

This shortened procedure requires that parties and the Court use email communication and that the procedural aspects of the case are directed by one director-appeal judge. The parties are asked to only introduce short written documents and not to bring forward new aspects that have not been discussed in the case before first instance. Also filing of a counterclaim is – in principle – not allowed.

The new procedure is only available at the request of both parties. Central to the procedure is a meeting in chambers that is arranged for both the pleadings and the taking of evidence. As a decision is given within eight weeks of this meeting, the total procedure, calculated from the time of filing the writ, should be finished within about 7-10 months.

With this speedy procedure, the Dutch courts again demonstrate that they are among the best courts in Europe for deciding IP cases, especially patent cases. One of the advantages is that there are preliminary procedures, which both in first instance and appeal can provide preliminary measures at very short notice. Next to speed, the Dutch courts in first instance and in appeal are renowned for their professional expertise, both in the legal and the scientific field. Lastly, the Dutch courts are notorious for their willingness to provide cross-border decisions, a strategy that has recently been approved by the Court of Justice of the EU for preliminary procedures (see our international briefing in the September issue).

wezenbeek.jpg

Bart van Wezenbeek


Vereenigde Octrooibureaux NV

Johan de Wittlaan 7, 2517 JR  The Hague

The Netherlands

Tel: +31 70 416 67 11

Fax: +31 70 416 67 99

patent@vereenigde.com

www.vereenigde.com 

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Apple’s lawsuit against OpenAI, which features Tier 1-ranked disputes firms on both sides, reflects how trade secrets litigation is becoming a prominent competition feature
Drew & Napier’s leadership appointments show one way full-service firms can back up claims about the strategic importance of IP
Strike-out application will hear claims that the copyright aspect of an IP infringement claim brought by a gambling and sports betting group should be dropped
Amongst a sea of mergers, Lathrop GPM and HG Law have set out plans to combine, positioning themselves to compete with both IP boutiques and full-service firms
Patrícia Paias explains why she loves the science and business behind an idea and why potential rights owners must avoid the ‘file and forget’ philosophy
Lawyers eagerly await news of what IP specialist Sir Colin Birss will bring to one of the England and Wales judiciary’s most important roles
María Aurora García of Berken IP explains how intellectual property rights holders can use customs monitoring and online enforcement tools to identify parallel imports and support compliance with consumer protection rules
The Jakarta-based firm says personal networks and a distinctive strategy can help it guide foreign clients through what can be a tricky IP landscape
Munich litigation boutique formed by former Taylor Wessing partners continues expansion as it seeks to cement its position in the UPC market
Yvonne Tang and Siau Wen Lim, the second and third IP specialists to sit on the firm’s management committee, say IP is ‘uniquely positioned’ to support cross-practice work
Gift this article