US district court patent litigation rises 20% in August

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US district court patent litigation rises 20% in August

US patent lit Aug 2018 168

Data pulled from Docket Navigator reveals US district court patent case filing increased in August from July, with PersonalWeb extending its lead as the year’s top plaintiff

US DISTRICT COURT PATENT LITIGATION BY MONTH

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

January

357

485

330

449

275

321

348

February

386

550

447

493

305

316

323

March

533

403

498

510

396

418

403

April

400

604

681

393

459

457

377

May

406

502

388

609

391

411

308

June

437

484

413

656

462

413

317

July

341

478

421

478

424

385

323

August

563

520

397

310

413

416

388

September

463

552

320

326

324

317

October

509

515

341

442

408

454

November

517

578

332

843

370

336

December

540

422

440

280

427

304

Total for year

5,452

6,093

5,008

5,789

4,654

4,548

2,787

Average monthly

cases filed

454.3

507.8

417.3

482.4

387.8

379.0

348.4

Source: Docket Navigator

US district court patent case filing rose 20% in August from July, according to data pulled from Docket Navigator on September 7 2018.

The number of filings for August was 388 in comparison with 323 in July. August received the second highest number of filings for 2018; only March is ahead of it with 403.

The number of filings in August is 11% higher than the average monthly number for the year so far of 348.4 cases. Despite the increase in numbers, the amount of filings for August 2018 is still not as high as the number for August 2017, which had 416 filings. There has therefore been a 7% decrease in August numbers between the two years.

Data showing filing numbers for August 2012 to August 2018 reveals that the filing numbers for August 2018 are the second lowest in these years. Only August 2015 had a lower number, with 310 filings.

Top plaintiffs

The top plaintiffs in August 2018 were Level 3 Communications (26 cases), PersonalWeb Technologies (26), Express Mobile (25) and Uniloc (11).

The top four plaintiffs have some overlap with the top plaintiffs for July as well as those for the first half of the year. Uniloc was the top plaintiff in July with 25 filings. PersonalWeb Technologies and Level 3 Communications also featured at the top of the plaintiffs list in July, though they were each only involved in seven cases. In the first half of the year, Level 3 Communications (76), PersonalWeb Technologies (76) and Uniloc (48) all featured in the top three. Express Mobile was not at the top of the plaintiff table for either July or the first half of the year.

Level 3 Communications and PersonalWeb were plaintiffs on the same cases in August. They sued companies including Brooklyn Brewery, Wework and Cars.com, asserting a total of four patents related to accessing data in a data processing system and enforcement of licensed content using content-based identifiers.

The two plaintiffs have filed 111 cases this year, as of the end of August. Some 74 of them were filed in the Northern District of California, 15 in Delaware, 13 in the Southern District of New York, five in the Eastern District of Texas and four in the Eastern District of New York.

Express Mobile’s 25 cases in August pushed its 2018 filings to 34 total cases, eight of which were filed in January while one was filed in June. Two patents are being asserted in the cases, both entitled “Browser based web site generation tool and run time engine”.

Top defendants

The top defendants for August 2018 were Huawei (which was a defendant in five cases), LG Electronics (five), Amazon.com (four) and AT&T (three).

A number of other companies come next in the list as defendants in two cases. These companies include Apple, Samsung, Teva and ZTE. Amazon was involved in 14 cases in July. Other names at the top of the list in July, which are also near the top of the list in August are Teva, ZTE and Apple. The top defendants in August are not very different from those for the first half of the year. The defendants involved in the most cases in the first half of the year were Apple (30), Samsung (25), LG Electronics (25), Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (24), Zydus (15) and Amazon.com (14). Huawei was fairly near the top of the list. It was involved in 11 cases.

US patent lit aug 2018



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers adapting to AI-driven recommendations are being pushed to demonstrate expertise publicly rather than simply relying on a polished website
Mid-market businesses looking to establish an online presence need ‘holistic’ brand protection services at an accessible cost, according to partners
Our latest update also includes the latest case filing statistics, and an update on how a transatlantic merger could be a UPC opportunity for the US half of the partnership
New partners, from biotech company Leyden Labs and Novartis, take the total number of partner hires to 12 since the firm took on external investment in late 2024
Labelled the ‘largest law firm merger in history’, the new outfit could also spell an opportunity for US clients to capitalise on Hogan Lovells' UPC expertise
Andy Lee and Amy Brooks of Brandsmiths explain how the firm secured a win for Peppa Pig over rival children’s character Wolfoo, in a case that centred on copied audio clips
Pedro Moreira outlines proposals by INPI that look set to open a discussion regarding biological materials, extracts, sequences, genetically edited plants, and computer programs
The combined firm, which has a newly appointed IP partner in London, brings together more than 3,500 practitioners across 52 offices, with flagship hubs in Seattle, London, Sydney and New York
A host of SEP-rich law firms, both leading arguments and as intervenors, are set to feature in the UK Supreme Court’s third FRAND episode, though one ground of appeal has been settled
Law firms are investing in generative engine optimisation and boosting their online presence in the hope of gaining a new client base
Gift this article