UK: The importance of accuracy with RCDs
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

UK: The importance of accuracy with RCDs

A recent case Scomadi Ltd & Anr v RA Engineering Co at the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC) referencing two Registered Community Designs (RCD) showed the importance of accurate agreements between parties involved in manufacture and sales. The issues before the judge were breach of contract and infringement relating to three scooter models manufactured and sold by RA Engineering. The registered rights were two Registered Community Designs for motor scooters. The RCDs were owned by Scomadi who themselves sold a portfolio of retro-style vehicles with the look of the well-known 1960s Lambretta scooters.

Although the case was decided on the contractual issues, RA Engineering were, in the end, found to have the right to deal in the scooters and there were some useful comments on the issue of RCD validity and infringement. In particular, on the test of novel and individual character the informed user was considered to be a user of scooters and one that was familiar in the design field with both classic and modern scooter designs. The RCDs were found to be novel and have enough detailed differences over the prior published Lambretta scooters (prior art) to be valid, although the scope of the protection was narrow. Novelty was mainly due to a difference in the detail of the length:width ratio of certain side panels of the designs. The judge's findings were that out of three scooter models manufactured and sold by RA Engineering only one was found to infringe. The infringing model did not create on the user a different overall impression to one of the two RCDs.

The infringement verdict, however, was not part of the final outcome as on the true construction of an agreement between the parties the judge considered that RA Engineering were entitled to manufacture and sell the three models of motor scooters of the agreement. This is a stark reminder that there is value in getting agreements and contracts right at the start of a commercial relationship.

The IPEC was created as a specialist court within the High Court and has operated since October 2013. The court deals with smaller, simpler claims and so is intended to provide a venue where proceedings are quick, less complex and less expensive than those at the High Court.


Catherine Bonner

Chapman IPKings Park House22 Kings Park RoadSouthampton SO15 2ATUnited KingdomTel: +44 (0) 23 80000 2022

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Tamara Moll discusses solving the mysteries of the universe over lunch, desk dancing, and why even old cookie recipes could benefit from IP love
Women leaders at four firms discuss how they handle clients' diversity requirements and build strong teams
The new head of Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick outlines his vision for the firm and explains why D&I measures need constant work
Based on surveys covering more than 25,000 in-house lawyers, the series provides insights into what law firms must score highly on when pitching to in-house counsel
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Tony Nguyen, who returned to Fish & Richardson this month after a year travelling overseas, tells Managing IP how and why he took the plunge
Tom Treutler, who previously managed the Vietnamese office of Tilleke & Gibbins, has joined East IP
Counsel discuss upcoming AI and data privacy legislation and what they’ve learned since Chile joined the Madrid Protocol
INTA has postponed its planned Annual Meeting in Dubai, but the organisation should think carefully about whether it wants to go there at all
The firm has named its new managing director after its former Asia head resigned earlier this year
Gift this article