Analysing SCOTUS oral arguments in Oil States and SAS Institute

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Analysing SCOTUS oral arguments in Oil States and SAS Institute

US Supreme Court 2 Credit Joao Fernandes 168

US Supreme Court Justices seemed divided during arguments for Oil States v Greene’s Energy and SAS Institute v Matal. Patent lawyers have been busy making predictions about how the court will rule in the two cases, which could dramatically change how the Patent Trial and Appeal Board operates

Unlock this content.

The content you are trying to view is exclusive to our subscribers.

To unlock this content:

Take a Free Trial or Login
more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partners at Baker Botts explain why oral arguments were a crucial factor in convincing the Federal Circuit to affirm a lower court ruling
The operator hopes to capitalise on significant market opportunities presented by evolving voice technologies
Stelling is a co-founder of Brand Action
Dixon is president of CIPA, Saliger is president of CITMA, and Tunney is president of APTMA
Poe is executive vice president and chief legal officer at ConnectWise
Moore is head of IP at Mattel in California 
Moreira is head of Brazil’s IP office (INPI)
Hurtado Rivas is general counsel for brands and marketing properties, anti-counterfeiting and licensing at Nestlé in Switzerland
Gift this article