Confusion over business methods debated in CLS v Alice today

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Confusion over business methods debated in CLS v Alice today

The Federal Circuit will consider questions which may redefine the law on US business method patents as it begins its en banc rehearing of CLS Bank v Alice today

The Court ordered the en banc rehearing after overturning its controversial 2-1 decision in July 2012 to affirm Alice’s patent claims for a computerised trading system which minimises risk.

The case, which dates back to CLS's 2007 suit seeking to invalidate Alice's patents, hinges on what constitutes a patent-ineligible abstract idea.

The judges have agreed to consider questions central to the confusion surrounding what constitutes patent eligibility under section 101. These include what test the court should adopt to determine whether a computer-implemented invention is an abstract idea and in what circumstances, if any, computer implementation makes an otherwise abstract idea patent-eligible.

The court will also attempt to decide whether it matters if the invention is claimed as a method, system, or storage medium, and whether such claims should at times be considered equivalent for section 101 purposes.

Mark Perry of Gibson Dunn & Crutcher is representing CLS Bank and CLS Services and Adam Perlman of Williams & Connolly is representing Alice in the case.

The recording of the en banc hearing will be available on the Federal Circuit’s website later today.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Alston & Bird acted for InterDigital, while Samsung was represented by Fish & Richardson, during the arbitration process
Powell Gilbert lawyers reveal how they navigated parallel EPO proceedings and collaborated with European peers to come out on top in the Nordic-Baltic Division’s first judgment
The firms posted increases in revenue and profit per equity partner, with both giving a nod to their IP expertise
EasyGroup, the owner of the easyJet airline, said in a press release that UK-based first-instance judges are “less experienced”, bringing a long-running debate back to the fore
A cross-practice team from Mayer Brown, which included members of the firm’s IP practice, advised on the deal
María Cecilia Romoleroux discusses the challenges she has faced in her career in IP and how she hopes to improve things for the next generation of women
Value-added services give in-house counsel the satisfaction that they are getting more value for money, while law firms get the opportunity to win more work
A team at Boies Schiller Flexner is advising shoe company Kizik and parent company HandsFree Labs in the dispute
Nokia’s latest enforcement actions against Geely and Transsion joining Via LA’s AAC pool were also among the top talking points
Benjamin Kelly, the firm’s fifth IP partner hire in a little over one year, has experience in patent and trade secret disputes involving complex technologies
Gift this article