Discounted disputes for .eu

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Discounted disputes for .eu

Fees for filing a dispute over a .eu domain name have been slashed for the second half of this year

The cost of a case with a single panellist and up to five domains comes down from €1300 to €600 while a similar case before three panellists is reduced from €3100 to €2400.

Cases involving more domains are also each reduced by €700.

The .eu dispute service is run by the Czech Arbitration Court (CAC) and .eu registry EURid. In a statement, the organisations said that an external audit had recommended a fee cut.

They said CAC would also enhance the online platform and procedural routines.

Last year, there were just 47 .eu ADR cases and 42 decisions published, 90% of them in favour of the complainant. There have been more than 1,000 proceedings since the launch of .eu in 2005.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The move marks the latest step in Temu’s push to protect brands’ intellectual property by collaborating with industry groups and enforcement agencies. Managing IP learns about a rapidly scaling strategy and two success stories
A counterfeiting crackdown targeting fake FIFA World Cup merchandise and new partner hires by CMS, HGF and Winston Strawn were also among the top talking points
Law firms need to accept the hard truth: talent migration isn't personal; it's business as usual
Judge Alan Albright is to leave his role at the Western District of Texas, and could return to private practice
Stobbs has successfully seen off a contempt of court application filed against the firm and two of its lawyers
After almost a quarter of a century, Marshall Gerstein has a new managing partner
Abbott winning another round against Sinocare and Menarini, and 'long arm' clarification on the UK's position within the UPC, were also among major developments
Maria Peyman, head of IP at Birketts, explains why the firm is adopting a ‘seamless approach’ for clients by integrating two of its practice areas
Matthew Swinn, who leads the firm’s IP practice, discusses why Mallesons is well-placed to remain a major IP force
Lawyers at A&O Shearman analyse developments regarding UPC’s long-arm jurisdiction, including its scope and jurisdictional limits
Gift this article