China trade mark: IP protection is enhanced for e-commerce in China

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China trade mark: IP protection is enhanced for e-commerce in China

The e-commerce market in China is one of the fastest growing in the world. The boom in Chinese e-commerce has been dramatic and exponential. During the Chinese annual Singles Day shopping frenzy in 2018, the world's biggest 24-hour shopping event, Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba hit a record US$30.7 billion in orders.

To improve regulation over the flourishing market and maintain the market order, China promulgated the E-Commerce Law which will take effect on January 1 2019. The E-Commerce Law deals with a range of areas, such as intellectual property protection, personal data protection, advertising, competition and consumer rights. In this article, we highlight IP protection in the new E-commerce Law.

Under the E-commerce Law, "e-commerce" refers to activities such as selling goods or providing services through the internet or other information networks. It is also worth noting that the E-commerce Law will not apply to certain e-commerce activities including provision of financial products and services, news publications, audio and video programmes, general publications, and cultural products. The law specifically regulates three categories of e-commerce operators: i) platform operators (e.g. e-commerce platforms such as Taobao or JD.com); ii) operators on platform (e.g. online shops on those platforms), and iii) other operators (e.g. traders who use public accounts on apps).

In principle, the law requires all e-commerce operators to fulfil their obligations to protect intellectual property rights, consumers' rights and interests as well as personal information, cyberspace security and the environment. In accordance with Article 41, platform operators are required to establish rules to protect IP rights on their platforms, as well as to strengthen cooperation with IP rights owners.

Articles 42-45 of the E-commerce Law formulates detailed rules in connection with a notice-and-take-down procedure as follows:

i) If an IP right holder believes that an operator on a platform has infringed its IP rights, the IP right holder can inform the relevant platform operator of the infringement together with the prima facie evidence, and request that the platform operator take necessary steps including removing the postings or blocking links to allegedly infringing products.

ii) The platform operator shall forward the notice of the IP right holder to the operator on platform. Upon receiving the notice, the operator on platform may present a statement of non-infringement to the platform operator along with prima facie evidence.

iii) The platform operator shall pass the statement to the IP rights holder and request that the IP rights holder complain to the relevant competent authorities or bring its case to a court.

iv) If the platform operator does not receive a notice of a complaint or a lawsuit within 15 days, the platform operator should terminate the measures it has taken.

The E-commerce Law imposes liability for IP infringement on platform operators. If the platform operator does not take the necessary measures upon receiving the notice from the IP right holder, it will be jointly and severally liable for the additional damages caused by the IP infringement. If the platform operator knows or should have known about the infringement but fails to take the necessary measures, it will be jointly and severally liable for the entire damages. As the Law remains silent on what constitutes "should have known" about an infringement, this obligation can be broadly interpreted. On the other hand, to prevent the IP right holder from abusing its rights, the E-commerce Law stipulates that the IP right holder shall be held liable if it causes any damage to the operator on platform by its wrongful notice. If the IP right holder maliciously presents a notice, the liability will be doubled.

To further strengthen the liabilities of the platform operator, an administrative penalty is imposed against platform operators. In accordance with Article 84 of the E-commerce Law, if platform operators fail to take necessary measures against operators who have infringed IP rights, administrative authorities in charge have powers to issue a correction order. If a platform operator fails to make corrections in accordance with the order, it may be fined between RMB 50,000 (US$7,000) and RMB 500,000. In serious infringement cases, the fines can be more than RMB 500,000, up to a maximum of RMB 2 million.

Finally, it should be noted that the E-commerce Law typically requires web shops on e-commerce platforms to obtain a business licence, file tax returns and pay taxes. Although this provision triggers controversies by driving many smaller players out of business, the new obligation has a positive influence on e-commerce business in China. It was widely reported that counterfeiting by small players was particularly prevalent on platforms for a long time as it was extremely hard for an IP right holder or the administrative authority in charge to locate the real identification and address of an IP infringer. This new obligation leaves no room for small players who sell counterfeit products to dodge enforcement actions by simply closing their online virtual shop without paying any compensation and setting up a new e-shop later on. This provision will inevitably prevent a flood of counterfeiters and fraud in online marketplaces and create a healthy environment for e-commerce development in China.

Although it remains to be seen how the E-commerce Law will be enforced, it reflects China's pledge to protect IP rights in the e-commerce market. It is anticipated that platform operators will be revisiting their internal policies to step up their efforts to fight IP infringement on their platforms, which may ultimately eliminate counterfeit goods in online marketplaces.

tom

linda

Tom

Zhang

Linda

Zhao


GoldenGate LawyersSuite 2311-12, The Spaces International Center No.8 Dongdaqiao Road, Chaoyang District Beijing 100020, ChinaTel: +8610 5870 2028mail@goldengatelawyers.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Apple’s lawsuit against OpenAI, which features Tier 1-ranked disputes firms on both sides, reflects how trade secrets litigation is becoming a prominent competition feature
Drew & Napier’s leadership appointments show one way full-service firms can back up claims about the strategic importance of IP
Strike-out application will hear claims that the copyright aspect of an IP infringement claim brought by a gambling and sports betting group should be dropped
Amongst a sea of mergers, Lathrop GPM and HG Law have set out plans to combine, positioning themselves to compete with both IP boutiques and full-service firms
Patrícia Paias explains why she loves the science and business behind an idea and why potential rights owners must avoid the ‘file and forget’ philosophy
Lawyers eagerly await news of what IP specialist Sir Colin Birss will bring to one of the England and Wales judiciary’s most important roles
María Aurora García of Berken IP explains how intellectual property rights holders can use customs monitoring and online enforcement tools to identify parallel imports and support compliance with consumer protection rules
The Jakarta-based firm says personal networks and a distinctive strategy can help it guide foreign clients through what can be a tricky IP landscape
Munich litigation boutique formed by former Taylor Wessing partners continues expansion as it seeks to cement its position in the UPC market
Yvonne Tang and Siau Wen Lim, the second and third IP specialists to sit on the firm’s management committee, say IP is ‘uniquely positioned’ to support cross-practice work
Gift this article