CRISPR interference decision, Center for Intellectual Property Understanding, Alibaba, Section 101, Northern District of California – the week in IP

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

CRISPR interference decision, Center for Intellectual Property Understanding, Alibaba, Section 101, Northern District of California – the week in IP

February 15 2017
uspto-seal-150.gif

The USPTO ruling “no interference in fact” in the CRISPR patents dispute, the unveiling of a new non-profit devoted to increasing awareness of IP rights, Alibaba accusing agencies of filing false complaints, IBM’s Manny Schecter calling for Congress to act on Section 101, and new patent case rules in the Northern District of California were in the intellectual property news in the past week

Unlock this content.

The content you are trying to view is exclusive to our subscribers.

To unlock this content:

Take a Free Trial or Login

Topics

TrademarksCopyrightUnited StatesPatentsNorth AmericaJurisdictions
more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Patents
Pharma.jpg
Chadha & Chadha partner excited to deliver ‘real value’ to pharma clients
Ranjna Mehta-Dutt, who moved to Chadha & Chadha after 25 years at Remfry & Sagar, says the firm plans to expand its life sciences practice through targeted recruitment and dedicated teams for bigger clients
Sukanya Sarkar, June 09 2026
Trademarks
Entrance to the Royal Court of Justice
Appeal filed in contempt claim targeting UK IP firm
The initial contempt of court claim targeted Stobbs and the firm’s client for allegedly interfering with the administration of justice
Max Walters, June 09 2026
Patents
2026_04_22_DeepIP_Patentmaker_P1665038.jpg
Breaking: DeepIP acquires PatentMaker, launches in Germany
Acquisition of platform developed by Boehmert & Boehmert lawyer set to create a combined platform for patent drafting and prosecution in Europe
June 09 2026
Trademarks
London 1FC_Offices_2934-012.jpg
360 offering: why Stephenson Harwood is taking a punt on prosecution
Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Max Walters, June 08 2026
Sponsored content
Hands of coworkers putting puzzle pieces together featuring icons such as a lightbulb and a graph
Sponsored by CAS
Nine strategies for effective collaboration between IP and R&D
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
June 08 2026
Sponsored content
Person holding abstract image of scales of justice and icons featuring AI and a lightbulb
Sponsored by CAS
AI and the future of IP law
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
June 08 2026
Sponsored content
Cityscape of Singapore
Sponsored by That.Legal
Proving bad faith in Singapore
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Gillian Tan, June 08 2026
Patents
trade-secret-podcast-min.jpeg
Trade Secrets in Brazil: strategic protection in an innovation-friendly environment
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
June 08 2026
Patents
JinOoi.jpg
Exclusive: Finnegan hires Kirkland partner as it eyes UK growth
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
Max Walters, June 08 2026
Patents
pharma-min.jpeg
‘Sigh of relief for generics’: SCOTUS rules on Hikma v Amarin
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
Sanjana Mishra, June 05 2026
Gift this article