CRISPR interference decision, Center for Intellectual Property Understanding, Alibaba, Section 101, Northern District of California – the week in IP

February 15 2017

The USPTO ruling “no interference in fact” in the CRISPR patents dispute, the unveiling of a new non-profit devoted to increasing awareness of IP rights, Alibaba accusing agencies of filing false complaints, IBM’s Manny Schecter calling for Congress to act on Section 101, and new patent case rules in the Northern District of California were in the intellectual property news in the past week

Unlock this content.

The content you are trying to view is exclusive to our subscribers.

To unlock this content:

Request Access or Login

Topics

Trademarks Copyright Patents Jurisdictions United States (National) North America

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Fieldfisher and Bird & Bird gear up for Getty AI appeal

Rival IP teams return to court for a closely watched appeal over AI and copyright, but observers hoping for answers to some of the technology’s biggest legal questions may be left disappointed

Max Walters, November 11 2026

Patents

Lateral hires boost FPA’s Singapore office

Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year

James Nurton, November 10 2026

Patents

Kenya: From the farm to the laptop, protecting IP in a digital world

Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models

Dominic Indokhomi, November 10 2026

Patents

Penny Gilbert: from pouring the tea to founding a law firm

The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success

Max Walters, November 10 2026

Patents

Law firm founder on AI, patent drafting and changing client expectations

Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently

November 09 2026

Patents

Beyond the headlines: AI is changing IP pricing, but don’t expect a revolution yet

As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work

Sukanya Sarkar, November 09 2026

Patents

‘Eyes wide open’: Ropes spin-out HG Law applies Fish & Neave lessons to Lathrop deal

HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination

Sanjana Mishra, November 09 2026

Trademarks

Before distress hits: protecting and maximising IP value

David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency

Evan Lazerowitz, November 09 2026

Patents

‘Not the heiress, but the successor’: a new vision for a family firm

Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation

Sanjana Mishra, November 06 2026

Patents

Weekly take: Law firms can’t bluff their way to IP expertise

Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it

November 06 2026