INTA and the Philippines IP Office sign MOU

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

INTA and the Philippines IP Office sign MOU

INTA-IPOPHL

INTA President J. Scott Evans and Allan B. Gepty, Deputy Director General of the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (IPOPHL), yesterday signed a deal to increase levels of cooperation between the two organizations.

INTA-IPOPHL

The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) covers invitations to programs and meetings; cooperation in the organization of programs and meetings; the development of training programs; and the development of trademark-related programs for the public. This year, for example, INTA and IPOPHL plan to run a project focused on customs training in ASEAN countries.

“This MOU will help us to provide greater support to Philippine brands owners and IP practitioners so that they can effectively protect and grow their trademark portfolios,” said Evans. “We also look forward to developing educational programs for the Philippine public to help us demonstrate the importance of trademark protection and the key role that trademarks plays in their national economy.”

He added: “The MOU signed today demonstrates INTA’s continued efforts to internationalize and to offer its tremendous membership as a resource to other jurisdictions to cooperate with them to help improve their IP systems.”

Gepty said that the Philippines is entering “a demographic and middle income sweet spot” that makes it an attractive destination for global brands. “Trademarks will play a vital role in our country and benefit consumers,” he said. “In our country the mantra at the moment is ‘public-private partnership.’ This agreement is another remarkable milestone on the path towards the recognition of the importance of IP rights in the Philippines.”

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Leaders at US law firms explain what attorneys can learn from AI cases involving Meta and Anthropic, and why the outcomes could guide litigation strategies
Attorneys reveal the trademark and copyright trends they’ve noticed within the first half of 2025
Senior leaders at TE Connectivity and Clarivate explain how they see the future of innovation
A new action filed by Nokia against Asus and a landmark ruling on counterfeits by South Africa’s Supreme Court were also among the top talking points
Counsel explain how they’re navigating patent prosecution matters and highlight key takeaways from Federal Circuit cases
A partner who joined Fenwick alongside two others explains what drew her to the firm and her hopes for growth in Boston
The England and Wales High Court has granted Kirkland & Ellis client Samsung interim declaratory relief in its ongoing FRAND dispute with ZTE
A UDRP decision that found in favour of a small business in a domain name dispute could encourage more businesses to take a stand in ‘David v Goliath’ cases
In Iconix v Dream Pairs, the Supreme Court said the Court of Appeal was wrong to interfere with an earlier ruling, prompting questions about the appeal court’s remit
Chris Moore at HGF reflects on the ‘spirit of collegiality’ that led to an important ruling in G1/24, a case concerning how European patent claims should be interpreted
Gift this article