IP review calls for evidence submissions

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

IP review calls for evidence submissions

IP practitioners have until March 1 to submit evidence to the UK's latest IP review

On Friday the IP Office published a call for evidence for the Review, to be led by Professor Ian Hargreaves.

The review will focus on intellectual property and growth, and it has three main aims: to outline the key elements of an IP systems that would promote UK economic growth; to set out first steps towards this goal; and to identify areas with potential for improvement where further evidence is needed.

The Review will cover all IP rights, but will focus on patents and copyright.

The call for evidence states: "We would like to hear about your experience of the current IP framework and your assessment of how well it promotes these objectives."

The four subjects likely to be covered in the Review are: IP and barriers to new internet-based models; cost and complexity of enforcement; interaction of IP and competition; and cost and complexity to SMEs.

The Review is due to be finished in April next year.

Anyone considering submitting a response should bear in mind that the Review encourages "economic data and related evidence which are methodologically sound, robust and clearly sourced" as well as "evidence in the form of case-studies and individual experiences which illustrate one or more of the issues under consideration".

It also welcomes evidence relating both to how the system operates as well as possible alternatives.

The call for evidence sets out a series of questions that correspondents can address. There are nine questions concerning patents, nine relating to copyright, seven on enforcement, and two each on IP and competition and SMEs.

Responses can be submitted electronically or by post.

Responses will be posted on the Review website when they are received, unless they are marked as confidential.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A host of SEP-rich law firms, both leading arguments and as intervenors, are set to feature in the UK Supreme Court’s third FRAND episode, though one claim has been settled
Law firms are investing in generative engine optimisation and boosting their online presence in the hope of gaining a new client base
A decision on a licensing rate payable by Warner Bros and Paramount, and a survey outlining UK businesses’ lack of IP preparation ahead of launching abroad, were among other major talking points
A fresh wave of deals highlights why investors favour IP firms and why independent outfits may soon have to rethink their strategy
King & Spalding has now hired 15 partners from Winston Taylor and legacy firm Winston & Strawn in offices spanning Texas, San Francisco, and Chicago
Firm says its work with a biotech client could signal a sea change in how - and when - law firms enter the drug development process
Evan Lazerowitz, attorney in Robinson + Cole’s bankruptcy and reorganisation group, offers key takeaways for IP interested parties in bankruptcy and insolvency proceedings
While the UK sees heavy IP rankings movement, Germany’s new tiered UPC table signals a shift from early adoption to market maturity
In an exclusive interview, Bernard Ledeboer reveals how a Consolid-backed group of firms wants to expand across Europe, invest in AI and centralise operations to compete at the top tier
Not all private equity firms are the same, so leaders at four externally backed IP firms came together to discuss the frameworks they followed and how they ensured a cultural fit
Gift this article