InternationalUSRemember you can easily switch between MIP US and MIP International at any time

Analysis: CJEU SPC basic patent ruling “doesn’t give any more clarity”

Patrick Wingrove, London

The CJEU attempted to clarify the meaning of “protected by a basic patent” in Teva v Gilead, but practitioners and in-house counsel say it raises more questions than it has answered including a new test that is not clear

Practitioners and in-house counsel report that a recent CJEU ruling raised more questions over whether a supplementary protection certificate is ‘protected by a basic patent’ than it answered. The court decided that an active ingredient combination is protected as long...

Please log in to read the rest of this article.

New to Managing Intellectual Property? Take advantage of free access to up to 5 articles on Managing IP and become a member today. It’s free to join and the benefits start straight away.

Already registered?

Please make sure you log in to read the rest of the article.

Log in

Join us now

Gain FREE access to up to five free articles when you register now.

Join here

More from the Managing IP blog

null null null

null null null

November / December 2019

IP law: are the pressures taking their toll?

Following World Mental Health Day, Max Walters seeks the views of in-house professionals on whether they struggle with workplace pressures, and asks how to improve wellbeing

Most read articles