Analysing the CRISPR arguments at the Federal Circuit
08 May 2018
|
Ellie Mertens, New York
The UC v Broad Institute appeal hinges on whether the PTAB made any legal errors by deciding the case in favour of Broad without "substantial evidence", with observers believing an affirmance of the Board's ruling is most likely
The Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in University of California (UC) v Broad Institute on April 30. A decision is expected within 90 days.
The dispute involves the revolutionary gene-editing biotechnology CRISPR-Cas9. UC filed its patent application in May 2012....
Please
log in to read the rest of this article.
New to Managing Intellectual Property? Take advantage of free access to up to 5 articles on Managing IP and become a member today. It’s free to join and the benefits start straight away.
Already registered?
Please make sure you log in to read the rest of the article.
Log in
Join us now
Gain FREE access to up to five free articles when you register now. Join here