Reaction: what the Supreme Court’s questions mean for Prometheus
The questions asked by the Supreme Court last week in Mayo v Prometheus have led to speculation that the justices might disagree with the Federal Circuit’s application of last year’s ruling in Bilski v Kappos to this case
“They granted cert because they wanted to say something,” said Cynthia Kernick of Reed Smith.
Whether it’s to say the Federal Circuit got it wrong, or that they got it right using the wrong analysis, as in Bilski, it is...
Please log in
to read the rest of this article. New to Managing Intellectual Property?
Take advantage of free access to up to 5 articles on Managing IP and become a member today. It’s free to join and the benefits start straight away.
Please make sure you log in to read the rest of the article.
Join us nowGain FREE access to up to five free articles when you register now.