Rules seek to curb BPAI backlog

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Rules seek to curb BPAI backlog

The Hyatt v Kappos decision is particularly significant, as the number of appeals being heard by the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI) has increased exponentially in recent years

According to the USPTO's fiscal year statistics, in the 2006 financial year there were 3,349 ex parte patent appeals filed, compared to 15,483 filed in 2009.

As of October 2010, there were 18,436 appeals pending at the BPAI. Of those, 5,308 have been pending for at least 14 months.

In an attempt to reduce this backlog, the USPTO today issued a notice of proposed rulemaking meant to alleviate some of the burdens associated with the appeals process.

The proposed rules would rescind the 2008 Final Rules on ex parte appeals, which were not welcomed by patent practitioners.

Those rules were ultimately held up due to issues with the Office of Management and Budget and thus were never officially implemented.

Comments received during the rulemaking process on the 2008 rules were very critical of the new requirements, emphasising the increased cost burden placed on appellants, particularly with respect to the statement of fact requirements and the imposition of a 30-page limit on briefs.

The Office said today that the newly proposed rules address the following points in particular:

• Rescinding the stayed 2008 Final Rule.


• Eliminating a number of briefing requirements that ask for information that is readily available in the file history (such as statements of the status of claims, status of amendments, grounds of rejection to be reviewed on appeal, the claims appendix, evidence appendix, and related proceedings appendix).


• Providing that only those claim limitations in dispute will need to be identified in the statement of the summary of the claimed subject matter.


• Providing for a simplified examiner's answer that focuses on addressing the applicant's arguments rather than repeating the final rejection.


• Providing that any new evidence relied upon in a rejection set forth in an examiner's answer shall be designated as a new ground of rejection. The proposals were crafted after feedback received earlier this year during a public roundtable on changes to BPAI practice and in response to an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in December 2009.

Comments on the proposed rules must be submitted by 5:00pm EST on January 14 2011.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

K&L Gates and Baker Botts have recruited leading patent practitioners from Wende IP and EIP, respectively, as they seek to strengthen European patent litigation capabilities
The departure of a large chunk of Spruson & Ferguson's legacy leadership could have destabilised the firm, but it's fighting back with strategic hires and promotions
By accepting a relatively small sample of infringing content to grant worldwide relief, a UK court has adopted a pragmatic approach that could reduce the time and expense involved in huge enforcement actions
This year’s IP STARS Americas rankings reveal that firms are expanding their capabilities, particularly in trade secrets and life sciences
Law firms’ expanding IP capabilities are driving broader industry recognition across a wider range of practice areas
As specialist boutiques challenge traditional firm models, major disputes involving Disney, Ericsson, Siemens and Dolby highlight the firms winning work before the UPC
The firm has added two leading damages specialists as it expands beyond technical analysis and deepens its role in the economics of IP litigation
Josh Seidenfeld, partner at DLA Piper, outlines the emerging legal trends that drive the future of life sciences innovation and how stakeholders can prepare for the future
South Korea's One Law Partners is combining with boutique firm Minwho Law Group to leverage global expansion of K-content and build a broader offering spanning IP, tech and regulatory advisory work
Russell Kennedy's Gina Tresidder on juggling matters, delivering hard truths, and why IP ownership is rarely as simple as people think
Gift this article