China trade mark: IP protection is enhanced for e-commerce in China

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China trade mark: IP protection is enhanced for e-commerce in China

The e-commerce market in China is one of the fastest growing in the world. The boom in Chinese e-commerce has been dramatic and exponential. During the Chinese annual Singles Day shopping frenzy in 2018, the world's biggest 24-hour shopping event, Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba hit a record US$30.7 billion in orders.

To improve regulation over the flourishing market and maintain the market order, China promulgated the E-Commerce Law which will take effect on January 1 2019. The E-Commerce Law deals with a range of areas, such as intellectual property protection, personal data protection, advertising, competition and consumer rights. In this article, we highlight IP protection in the new E-commerce Law.

Under the E-commerce Law, "e-commerce" refers to activities such as selling goods or providing services through the internet or other information networks. It is also worth noting that the E-commerce Law will not apply to certain e-commerce activities including provision of financial products and services, news publications, audio and video programmes, general publications, and cultural products. The law specifically regulates three categories of e-commerce operators: i) platform operators (e.g. e-commerce platforms such as Taobao or JD.com); ii) operators on platform (e.g. online shops on those platforms), and iii) other operators (e.g. traders who use public accounts on apps).

In principle, the law requires all e-commerce operators to fulfil their obligations to protect intellectual property rights, consumers' rights and interests as well as personal information, cyberspace security and the environment. In accordance with Article 41, platform operators are required to establish rules to protect IP rights on their platforms, as well as to strengthen cooperation with IP rights owners.

Articles 42-45 of the E-commerce Law formulates detailed rules in connection with a notice-and-take-down procedure as follows:

i) If an IP right holder believes that an operator on a platform has infringed its IP rights, the IP right holder can inform the relevant platform operator of the infringement together with the prima facie evidence, and request that the platform operator take necessary steps including removing the postings or blocking links to allegedly infringing products.

ii) The platform operator shall forward the notice of the IP right holder to the operator on platform. Upon receiving the notice, the operator on platform may present a statement of non-infringement to the platform operator along with prima facie evidence.

iii) The platform operator shall pass the statement to the IP rights holder and request that the IP rights holder complain to the relevant competent authorities or bring its case to a court.

iv) If the platform operator does not receive a notice of a complaint or a lawsuit within 15 days, the platform operator should terminate the measures it has taken.

The E-commerce Law imposes liability for IP infringement on platform operators. If the platform operator does not take the necessary measures upon receiving the notice from the IP right holder, it will be jointly and severally liable for the additional damages caused by the IP infringement. If the platform operator knows or should have known about the infringement but fails to take the necessary measures, it will be jointly and severally liable for the entire damages. As the Law remains silent on what constitutes "should have known" about an infringement, this obligation can be broadly interpreted. On the other hand, to prevent the IP right holder from abusing its rights, the E-commerce Law stipulates that the IP right holder shall be held liable if it causes any damage to the operator on platform by its wrongful notice. If the IP right holder maliciously presents a notice, the liability will be doubled.

To further strengthen the liabilities of the platform operator, an administrative penalty is imposed against platform operators. In accordance with Article 84 of the E-commerce Law, if platform operators fail to take necessary measures against operators who have infringed IP rights, administrative authorities in charge have powers to issue a correction order. If a platform operator fails to make corrections in accordance with the order, it may be fined between RMB 50,000 (US$7,000) and RMB 500,000. In serious infringement cases, the fines can be more than RMB 500,000, up to a maximum of RMB 2 million.

Finally, it should be noted that the E-commerce Law typically requires web shops on e-commerce platforms to obtain a business licence, file tax returns and pay taxes. Although this provision triggers controversies by driving many smaller players out of business, the new obligation has a positive influence on e-commerce business in China. It was widely reported that counterfeiting by small players was particularly prevalent on platforms for a long time as it was extremely hard for an IP right holder or the administrative authority in charge to locate the real identification and address of an IP infringer. This new obligation leaves no room for small players who sell counterfeit products to dodge enforcement actions by simply closing their online virtual shop without paying any compensation and setting up a new e-shop later on. This provision will inevitably prevent a flood of counterfeiters and fraud in online marketplaces and create a healthy environment for e-commerce development in China.

Although it remains to be seen how the E-commerce Law will be enforced, it reflects China's pledge to protect IP rights in the e-commerce market. It is anticipated that platform operators will be revisiting their internal policies to step up their efforts to fight IP infringement on their platforms, which may ultimately eliminate counterfeit goods in online marketplaces.

tom

linda

Tom

Zhang

Linda

Zhao


GoldenGate LawyersSuite 2311-12, The Spaces International Center No.8 Dongdaqiao Road, Chaoyang District Beijing 100020, ChinaTel: +8610 5870 2028mail@goldengatelawyers.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers adapting to AI-driven recommendations are being pushed to demonstrate expertise publicly rather than simply relying on a polished website
Mid-market businesses looking to establish an online presence need ‘holistic’ brand protection services at an accessible cost, according to partners
Our latest update also includes the latest case filing statistics, and an update on how a transatlantic merger could be a UPC opportunity for the US half of the partnership
New partners, from biotech company Leyden Labs and Novartis, take the total number of partner hires to 12 since the firm took on external investment in late 2024
Labelled the ‘largest law firm merger in history’, the new outfit could also spell an opportunity for US clients to capitalise on Hogan Lovells' UPC expertise
Andy Lee and Amy Brooks of Brandsmiths explain how the firm secured a win for Peppa Pig over rival children’s character Wolfoo, in a case that centred on copied audio clips
Pedro Moreira outlines proposals by INPI that look set to open a discussion regarding biological materials, extracts, sequences, genetically edited plants, and computer programs
The combined firm, which has a newly appointed IP partner in London, brings together more than 3,500 practitioners across 52 offices, with flagship hubs in Seattle, London, Sydney and New York
A host of SEP-rich law firms, both leading arguments and as intervenors, are set to feature in the UK Supreme Court’s third FRAND episode, though one ground of appeal has been settled
Law firms are investing in generative engine optimisation and boosting their online presence in the hope of gaining a new client base
Gift this article