Disparagement clause offends First Amendment, says SCOTUS in Tam
On Monday June 19, the Supreme Court handed down its 8-0 unanimous (Justice Gorsuch took no part) decision in Matal v Tam (formerly Lee v Tam), finding that the disparagement clause of US trade mark law is unconstitutional
The Slants (photo: Anthony Pidgeon)This is the last IP
decision of the Supreme Court’s particularly
IP-active term, and only the second time in US history that the
Court has found a trade mark statute in violation of the first
Please log in
to read the rest of this article. New to Managing Intellectual Property?
Take advantage of free access to up to 5 articles on Managing IP and become a member today. It’s free to join and the benefits start straight away.
Please make sure you log in to read the rest of the article.
Join us nowGain FREE access to up to five free articles when you register now.