Rihanna wins appeal in passing off case

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Rihanna wins appeal in passing off case

rihanna-logo-55.jpg

The Court of Appeal has upheld a ruling of the England & Wales High Court that Topshop committed passing off by using Rihanna’s image on t-shirts

Rihanna logo

But the judgment, published on January 22, also made it clear that there is no protection for image rights as such in UK law.

Lord Justice Kitchin said that the claimant in such cases must make his case on the evidence: “He must show that he has a relevant goodwill, that the activities of the defendant amount to a misrepresentation that he has endorsed or approved the goods or services of which he complains, and that these activities have caused or are likely to cause him damage to his goodwill and business.”

The other two judges agreed, though Lord Justice Underhill noted that he regarded this case as “close to the borderline”.

The Court rejected all four grounds on which Topshop challenged the High Court’s 2013 ruling.

Rihanna (whose so-called R slash logo is pictured) was represented by Martin Howe QC, Andrew Norris and Reed Smith. Topshop was represented by Geoffrey Hobbs QC, Hugo Cuddigan and Mishcon de Reya.

More analysis available online from Bird & Bird, Herbert Smith Freehills and King & Wood Mallesons.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Leaders at US law firms explain what attorneys can learn from AI cases involving Meta and Anthropic, and why the outcomes could guide litigation strategies
Attorneys reveal the trademark and copyright trends they’ve noticed within the first half of 2025
Senior leaders at TE Connectivity and Clarivate explain how they see the future of innovation
A new action filed by Nokia against Asus and a landmark ruling on counterfeits by South Africa’s Supreme Court were also among the top talking points
Counsel explain how they’re navigating patent prosecution matters and highlight key takeaways from Federal Circuit cases
A partner who joined Fenwick alongside two others explains what drew her to the firm and her hopes for growth in Boston
The England and Wales High Court has granted Kirkland & Ellis client Samsung interim declaratory relief in its ongoing FRAND dispute with ZTE
A UDRP decision that found in favour of a small business in a domain name dispute could encourage more businesses to take a stand in ‘David v Goliath’ cases
In Iconix v Dream Pairs, the Supreme Court said the Court of Appeal was wrong to interfere with an earlier ruling, prompting questions about the appeal court’s remit
Chris Moore at HGF reflects on the ‘spirit of collegiality’ that led to an important ruling in G1/24, a case concerning how European patent claims should be interpreted
Gift this article