Rihanna wins appeal in passing off case

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Rihanna wins appeal in passing off case

rihanna-logo-55.jpg

The Court of Appeal has upheld a ruling of the England & Wales High Court that Topshop committed passing off by using Rihanna’s image on t-shirts

Rihanna logo

But the judgment, published on January 22, also made it clear that there is no protection for image rights as such in UK law.

Lord Justice Kitchin said that the claimant in such cases must make his case on the evidence: “He must show that he has a relevant goodwill, that the activities of the defendant amount to a misrepresentation that he has endorsed or approved the goods or services of which he complains, and that these activities have caused or are likely to cause him damage to his goodwill and business.”

The other two judges agreed, though Lord Justice Underhill noted that he regarded this case as “close to the borderline”.

The Court rejected all four grounds on which Topshop challenged the High Court’s 2013 ruling.

Rihanna (whose so-called R slash logo is pictured) was represented by Martin Howe QC, Andrew Norris and Reed Smith. Topshop was represented by Geoffrey Hobbs QC, Hugo Cuddigan and Mishcon de Reya.

More analysis available online from Bird & Bird, Herbert Smith Freehills and King & Wood Mallesons.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The UK-India trade deal doesn’t mention legal services, showing India has again failed to agree on a move that could help foreign firms and local practitioners
Eva-Maria Strobel reveals some of the firm’s IP achievements and its approach to client relationships
Lateral hires at Thompson Hine and Pierson Ferdinand said they were inspired by fresh business opportunities and innovative strategies at their new firms
The launch of a new IP insurance product and INTA hiring a former USPTO commissioner were also among the top talking points this week
The firm explains how it secured a $170.6 million verdict against the government in a patent dispute surrounding airport technology, and why the case led to interest from other inventors
Developments of note included the court partially allowing a claim concerning confidentiality clubs and a decision involving technology used in football matches
The firm said adding capability in the French capital completes its coverage of all major patent litigation jurisdictions as it strives for UPC excellence
Marc Fenster explains how keeping the jury focused on the most relevant facts helped secure a $279m win for his client against Samsung
Clients are divided on what externally funded IP firms bring to the table, so those firms must prove why the benefits outweigh the downsides
Rahul Bhartiya, AI coordinator at the EUIPO, discusses the office’s strategy, collaboration with other IP offices, and getting rid of routine tasks
Gift this article