<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title>Trademarks</title>
        <link>https://www.managingip.com/rssfeeds/trademarks</link>
        <description></description>
        <copyright>Copyright(c) 2026 MIP LLC</copyright>
        <language>en</language>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 22:22:45 EDT</lastBuildDate>
        
        
        <item>
    <title>IP protection strategies combatting rise of deepfakes: Taylor Swift joins growing trend</title>
    <description>The singer is among an increasing number of celebrities using trademark law to counter AI-generated impersonation. Ann Henry, Sarah McMullen, and Isabel Humburg of Bird &amp; Bird (Ireland) examine evolving challenges for brand owners</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 08:05:44 EDT</pubDate>
    <link><![CDATA[https://www.managingip.com/article/2gim2bq2epja4flhnswsg/sponsored-content/ip-protection-strategies-combatting-rise-of-deepfakes-taylor-swift-joins-growing-trend]]></link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.managingip.com/article/2gim2bq2epja4flhnswsg/sponsored-content/ip-protection-strategies-combatting-rise-of-deepfakes-taylor-swift-joins-growing-trend</guid>
    <author>Ann Henry</author>
    
        
            <category domain="Other">Sponsored</category>
        
            <category domain="Article Access">Free</category>
        
            <category domain="Content Type">Practice of law</category>
        
            <category domain="Practice Area">Trademarks</category>
        
            <category domain="Firm">Bird &amp; Bird</category>
        
            <category domain="Jurisdictions">Europe</category>
        
    
    
        <media:thumbnail url="https://static.legalbenchmarkinggroup.com/dims4/default/82a2e3d/2147483647/strip/false/crop/6000x4002+0+0/resize/6000x4002!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk4-prod-legal.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F9d%2F3b%2F51fb4f6942ca8927752fe5180f73%2Fadobestock-1079617860-editorial-use-only.jpeg"/>
    
    
</item><item>
    <title>UPC expansion: what’s to come in latest IP STARS rankings</title>
    <description>With rankings for Western Europe set to be published on June 25, we sat down with our research lead to find out what practitioners and law firms can expect</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 05:50:20 EDT</pubDate>
    <link><![CDATA[https://www.managingip.com/article/2giallz9slzf4a7o3nlkw/rankings-analysis/upc-expansion-whats-to-come-in-latest-ip-stars-rankings]]></link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.managingip.com/article/2giallz9slzf4a7o3nlkw/rankings-analysis/upc-expansion-whats-to-come-in-latest-ip-stars-rankings</guid>
    <author>Max Walters</author>
    
        
            <category domain="Practice Area">Trademarks</category>
        
            <category domain="Practice Area">Patents</category>
        
            <category domain="Practice Area">Copyright</category>
        
            <category domain="Content Type">Rankings analysis</category>
        
            <category domain="Content Type">Business of law</category>
        
            <category domain="Content Type">News</category>
        
            <category domain="Jurisdictions">Europe</category>
        
            <category domain="Article Access">Default</category>
        
    
    
        <media:thumbnail url="https://static.legalbenchmarkinggroup.com/dims4/default/ccafdae/2147483647/strip/false/crop/840x560+0+0/resize/840x560!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk4-prod-legal.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F89%2Fd6%2Fc991d3d94ab8b4ec7725c8e51c47%2F2026-western-europe-pic.png"/>
    
    
</item><item>
    <title>Injunctive relief without proceedings on the merits: the incompatibility of Italy’s IP Code with EU law</title>
    <description>Matteo Di Lernia, advocate at LCA Studio Legale, unpicks the CJEU’s ruling in M.M. Ristorazione v Villa Ramazzini, including its impact on litigation strategies</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 04:45:53 EDT</pubDate>
    <link><![CDATA[https://www.managingip.com/article/2gi4qrnd3jyzv10xj6jnk/trademarks/injunctive-relief-without-proceedings-on-the-merits-the-incompatibility-of-italys-ip-code-with-eu-law]]></link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.managingip.com/article/2gi4qrnd3jyzv10xj6jnk/trademarks/injunctive-relief-without-proceedings-on-the-merits-the-incompatibility-of-italys-ip-code-with-eu-law</guid>
    <author>Matteo Di Lernia</author>
    
        
            <category domain="Jurisdictions">Italy</category>
        
            <category domain="Content Type">Features</category>
        
            <category domain="Article Access">Default</category>
        
            <category domain="Content Type">Practice of law</category>
        
            <category domain="Practice Area">Trademarks</category>
        
            <category domain="Jurisdictions">European Union</category>
        
    
    
        <media:thumbnail url="https://static.legalbenchmarkinggroup.com/dims4/default/67fe7ad/2147483647/strip/false/crop/490x314+0+0/resize/490x314!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Feuromoney-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2F9f%2F6a%2F884fe236032fbd01d07b47ea609f%2Fecj-490x.jpg"/>
    
    
</item><item>
    <title>Exclusive: Plasseraud IP enters new era with ‘sponsorless’ investment</title>
    <description>Leaders at IP boutique say the decision to pursue sponsorless partnership with the specialised investment arm of a private equity firm comes at a time of ‘profound transformation’ in the profession</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 03:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
    <link><![CDATA[https://www.managingip.com/article/2gi4tcishzs3ooivre3gg/patents/exclusive-plasseraud-ip-enters-new-era-with-sponsorless-investment]]></link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.managingip.com/article/2gi4tcishzs3ooivre3gg/patents/exclusive-plasseraud-ip-enters-new-era-with-sponsorless-investment</guid>
    <author>Max Walters</author>
    
        
            <category domain="Article Access">Default</category>
        
            <category domain="Content Type">News</category>
        
            <category domain="Content Type">Exclusives </category>
        
            <category domain="Content Type">Business of law</category>
        
            <category domain="Practice Area">Patents</category>
        
            <category domain="Practice Area">Trademarks</category>
        
            <category domain="Jurisdictions">France</category>
        
            <category domain="Jurisdictions">European Patent Convention</category>
        
            <category domain="Jurisdictions">European Union</category>
        
    
    
        <media:thumbnail url="https://static.legalbenchmarkinggroup.com/dims4/default/779ce90/2147483647/strip/false/crop/2667x1500+0+0/resize/2667x1500!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk4-prod-legal.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F5b%2Fa8%2F9939fc214afe9de90f87e408c7b6%2Fmip-photo-merge.png"/>
    
    
</item><item>
    <title>Delhi High Court rejects ‘own name’ defence in Reddy trademark dispute</title>
    <description>Ranjan Narula and Abhishek Nangia of RNA, Technology and IP Attorneys explain how the ruling clarifies the limits on the use of personal names in pharmaceutical trademarks</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 06:16:54 EDT</pubDate>
    <link><![CDATA[https://www.managingip.com/article/2gi51k294h9s0vwjf6iv4/sponsored-content/delhi-high-court-rejects-own-name-defence-in-reddy-trademark-dispute]]></link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.managingip.com/article/2gi51k294h9s0vwjf6iv4/sponsored-content/delhi-high-court-rejects-own-name-defence-in-reddy-trademark-dispute</guid>
    <author>Ranjan Narula</author>
    
        
            <category domain="Other">Sponsored</category>
        
            <category domain="Article Access">Free</category>
        
            <category domain="Content Type">Practice of law</category>
        
            <category domain="Jurisdictions">India</category>
        
            <category domain="Practice Area">Trademarks</category>
        
            <category domain="Firm">RNA, Technology and IP Attorneys</category>
        
    
    
        <media:thumbnail url="https://static.legalbenchmarkinggroup.com/dims4/default/ee585cd/2147483647/strip/false/crop/6000x4000+0+0/resize/6000x4000!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk4-prod-legal.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F99%2Fa8%2F3d89ea854049886b48e3632b4b65%2Fadobestock-421266524-editorial-use-only.jpeg"/>
    
    
</item><item>
    <title>Priority principle: is it applicable to earlier distinctive signs of a locality?</title>
    <description>Christos Xagoraris of Patrinos &amp; Kilimiris analyses a Greek court ruling confirming that earlier local distinctive signs can prevail over later trademarks within their territory</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 05:55:14 EDT</pubDate>
    <link><![CDATA[https://www.managingip.com/article/2gi4wzuzgp5kdy6pg4a2o/sponsored-content/priority-principle-is-it-applicable-to-earlier-distinctive-signs-of-a-locality]]></link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.managingip.com/article/2gi4wzuzgp5kdy6pg4a2o/sponsored-content/priority-principle-is-it-applicable-to-earlier-distinctive-signs-of-a-locality</guid>
    <author>Christos Xagoraris</author>
    
        
            <category domain="Other">Sponsored</category>
        
            <category domain="Article Access">Free</category>
        
            <category domain="Content Type">Practice of law</category>
        
            <category domain="Firm">Patrinos &amp; Kilimiris</category>
        
            <category domain="Practice Area">Trademarks</category>
        
            <category domain="Jurisdictions">Greece</category>
        
    
    
        <media:thumbnail url="https://static.legalbenchmarkinggroup.com/dims4/default/82c9626/2147483647/strip/false/crop/6198x3556+0+0/resize/6198x3556!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk4-prod-legal.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F56%2F9c%2F1ff026a843988f84fb06d934a0bf%2Fadobestock-220381967.jpeg"/>
    
    
</item><item>
    <title>Richard Meade elevated to England and Wales Court of Appeal</title>
    <description>New role for the High Court judge will leave a gap for an IP specialist judge at the first instance </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 05:15:53 EDT</pubDate>
    <link><![CDATA[https://www.managingip.com/article/2gi4uq1njxg49ai3538qo/patents/richard-meade-elevated-to-england-and-wales-court-of-appeal]]></link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.managingip.com/article/2gi4uq1njxg49ai3538qo/patents/richard-meade-elevated-to-england-and-wales-court-of-appeal</guid>
    
    
        
            <category domain="Article Access">Default</category>
        
            <category domain="Practice Area">Patents</category>
        
            <category domain="Practice Area">Trademarks</category>
        
            <category domain="Jurisdictions">United Kingdom</category>
        
            <category domain="Content Type">Practice of law</category>
        
            <category domain="Content Type">News</category>
        
    
    
        <media:thumbnail url="https://static.legalbenchmarkinggroup.com/dims4/default/b098979/2147483647/strip/false/crop/600x400+0+0/resize/600x400!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Feuromoney-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2F78%2Fa4%2Fa4d1da687dd9b5837f5345945c5f%2Frichard-meade-600-comp.jpg"/>
    
    
</item><item>
    <title>This week on MIP: InterDigital and Amazon sign deal | Padel TM uptick</title>
    <description>Updates on Nokia’s licensing strides and a surge in patent activity around battery recycling in Australia were also among the top talking points</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 04:51:33 EDT</pubDate>
    <link><![CDATA[https://www.managingip.com/article/2ghnhsro6echts2almubk/patents/this-week-on-mip-interdigital-and-amazon-sign-deal-padel-tm-uptick]]></link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.managingip.com/article/2ghnhsro6echts2almubk/patents/this-week-on-mip-interdigital-and-amazon-sign-deal-padel-tm-uptick</guid>
    <author>Sukanya Sarkar</author>
    
        
            <category domain="Article Access">Default</category>
        
            <category domain="Content Type">News</category>
        
            <category domain="Content Type">This Week in IP</category>
        
            <category domain="Content Type">Business of law</category>
        
            <category domain="Content Type">Practice of law</category>
        
            <category domain="Jurisdictions">International</category>
        
            <category domain="Practice Area">Patents</category>
        
            <category domain="Practice Area">Trademarks</category>
        
            <category domain="Practice Area">Copyright</category>
        
            <category domain="Industry Topics">AI</category>
        
    
    
        <media:thumbnail url="https://static.legalbenchmarkinggroup.com/dims4/default/05b6b8f/2147483647/strip/false/crop/2000x1333+0+0/resize/2000x1333!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk4-prod-legal.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F82%2F04%2Fc4046daa41c1a7bec2aa57a9ec01%2Fpadel.jpg"/>
    
    
</item><item>
    <title>Weekly take: The true cost of counterfeiting is impossible to ignore</title>
    <description>To mark International Day Against Child Labour, Matteo Amerio at Corsearch says the people inside businesses who can identify counterfeiting risks must be given the tools and authority to act</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 03:30:00 EDT</pubDate>
    <link><![CDATA[https://www.managingip.com/article/2gh1nepq5aepriiab4a9s/trademarks/weekly-take-the-true-cost-of-counterfeiting-is-impossible-to-ignore]]></link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.managingip.com/article/2gh1nepq5aepriiab4a9s/trademarks/weekly-take-the-true-cost-of-counterfeiting-is-impossible-to-ignore</guid>
    <author>Matteo Amerio </author>
    
        
            <category domain="Article Access">Default</category>
        
            <category domain="Content Type">News</category>
        
            <category domain="Jurisdictions">International</category>
        
            <category domain="Practice Area">Trademarks</category>
        
            <category domain="Industry Topics">Counterfeiting and e-commerce</category>
        
            <category domain="Content Type">Opinion</category>
        
    
    
        <media:thumbnail url="https://static.legalbenchmarkinggroup.com/dims4/default/ff89226/2147483647/strip/false/crop/6000x4000+0+0/resize/6000x4000!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk4-prod-legal.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F7f%2F2d%2F8b5a4daf4c59aa9aaa5125d41fb1%2Fcounterfeit.jpeg"/>
    
    
</item><item>
    <title>Upcycling defence falls short in Chanel trademark dispute</title>
    <description>Igor Charles of INLEX analyses a Paris court ruling that clarifies when alterations to genuine luxury goods constitute trademark infringement and misleading practices</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 06:47:31 EDT</pubDate>
    <link><![CDATA[https://www.managingip.com/article/2ghixlfp8d4cydq4oahog/sponsored-content/upcycling-defence-falls-short-in-chanel-trademark-dispute]]></link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.managingip.com/article/2ghixlfp8d4cydq4oahog/sponsored-content/upcycling-defence-falls-short-in-chanel-trademark-dispute</guid>
    <author>Igor Charles</author>
    
        
            <category domain="Other">Sponsored</category>
        
            <category domain="Article Access">Free</category>
        
            <category domain="Content Type">Practice of law</category>
        
            <category domain="Firm">INLEX</category>
        
            <category domain="Practice Area">Trademarks</category>
        
            <category domain="Jurisdictions">France</category>
        
    
    
        <media:thumbnail url="https://static.legalbenchmarkinggroup.com/dims4/default/3f2243e/2147483647/strip/false/crop/6000x4000+0+0/resize/6000x4000!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk4-prod-legal.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F75%2F99%2F9ccc64824b6b9a543934485d481a%2Fadobestock-514574448-editorial-use-only.jpeg"/>
    
    
</item>
    </channel>
</rss>