Facebook feels users’ wrath over Instagram terms of service
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Facebook feels users’ wrath over Instagram terms of service

Facebook’s fleeting decision to change Instagram’s terms of service yesterday highlights the fine line in social media between sound business policies and PR nightmares

“Legally, the scope of the rights that a company has in user and/or user-generated content depends on the grant of rights provisions in its Terms of Service,” said Michael Kasdan of Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein. This means that companies must spell out clearly what their rights are for users in order to guarantee maximum monetisation of the site’s content.

Under Facebook’s proposed model for Instagram yesterday, a third-party company could pay Facebook for images it may want to use, but Facebook is under no obligation to compensate the user, said Kasdan. “Notably, there is no opt-out provision; the choice for a user is either to use Instagram and give up these rights, or to use another service,” he added.

Instagram competitors like Flickr mobile have taken a different approach, requiring the express permission of the user before sharing photos with third parties, and sharing compensation with the user. 

Angry users, including Mark Zuckerberg’s wedding photographer, immediately voiced their concerns on Instagram yesterday.

“Ultimately, the market will decide” if this is a sound business decision for Facebook, said Kasdan following the announcement. “What we are seeing right now is a very strong and negative reaction among the user-base.”

Today, Instagram responded to the market’s concerns by backtracking on the changes, promising to “fix any mistakes, and eliminate the confusion”.

Kevin Systrom, co-founder of Instagram, continued in his blog post: “As we review your feedback and stories in the press, we’re going to modify specific parts of the terms to make it more clear what will happen with your photos.”

Systrom also said the site will remove the language about using users’ photos in ads.“We do not have plans for anything like this and because of that we’re going to remove the language that raised the question,” he wrote. 

"The market has spoken," said Kasdan. "And [Facebook is] listening."

For more tips on writing effective Terms of Service provisions, see Kasdan's and Charles Macedo's July article on the topic for Managing IP.



more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The former head of life sciences at Kramer Levin has joined Orrick, a firm that hopes to grow in the sector
Lionel Martin of August Debouzy and Kristof Neefs at Inteo share how they prevailed in a UPC Court of Appeal case surrounding access to documents
Counsel say ‘strange’ results have increased their reliance on subscription-based search platforms, but costs are not being shifted onto clients yet
The firm was among multiple winners at a record-breaking 2024 ceremony held in London on April 11
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The Americas research cycle has commenced. Do not miss this opportunity to nominate your work!
Increased and new patent fees could affect prosecution strategies for law firms and companies, according to sources
Five former Oblon lawyers felt that joining Merchant & Gould would help them offer the right prices to entice clients
The UK may not be a UPC member but its firms are still acting in proceedings, with Carpmaels among the most prominent
Naomi Pearce of Pearce IP shares how she is helping her firm become a life sciences leader and how generous policies have helped attract top talent
Gift this article