Trademark issues on the edge
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Trademark issues on the edge

Stereotypes about academics living in ivory towers were shattered yesterday as law professors considered the practical challenges of branding cannabis products and trademarking sex toys.

At the Sex, Drugs, Motorcycle Clubs: Trademark Issues on the Edge Professor Luncheon, academics talked about the problems of helping clients in the adult content industry and the legal marijuana trade to protect their IP rights.

Shabnam Malek of Cobalt explained the regulatory barriers that affect her clients’ abilities to trademark the names of their marijuana products in those states in the United States that now allow the sale of cannabis-related goods. “You can imagine how terrible this is from a branding perspective,” she said.

Todd Alberstone of Alberstone Consulting outlined the problems suffered by what he described as legitimate/established adult content brands in an online marketplace crowded with get-rich-quick businesses. “In the past brands such as PLAYBOY, PENTHOUSE and HUSTLER had very clear identities and associations. Now the adult content market is very different.”

He went on to discuss the problems that adult content companies have when they extend their brands into the retail market, such as selling sex toys. “There is an inherent conflict between the brand names used to drive search engine traffic and those that are acceptable to the USPTO. Terms that are descriptive or suggestive will cause problems,” he said.

The panel was hosted by David Bell of Haynes & Boone. The vice-chair of the Academic Committee, Megan Carpenter of Texas A&M School of Law, said that the session was designed to examine the issues that push the boundaries of trademark law.

The Academic Committee has 65 members. Among other things its members organize the Academic Course on International Trademark Law and a Career Development Day for law students at the Annual Meeting, as well as hosting the Professor Luncheon for IP deans and law professors. This year they also launched the (Dis)Order in the Court debate featuring practitioners and professors debating topical law issues.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

As Australia’s Qantm IP leans towards being acquired by a private equity company, sources discuss what it could mean for IP firms
Law firms that are conscious of their role in society are more likely to win work, according to a survey of over 23,000 in-house professionals
Pham Nghiem Xuan Bac, managing partner of Vision & Associates, discusses opportunities created by the US-China rift as well as profitability issues facing IP practices
Douglas Leite and two of his colleagues were intrigued by Bhering Advogados’s mission to grow its patent litigation practice
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP practitioner about their life and career
Counsel explain how pricing flexibility, patent agents and being business partners can help them maintain profitable patent prosecution practices
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Speakers at an INTA event weighed in on why firms should create AI use policies and how they stay on top of the latest developments
The England and Wales Court of Appeal backed Lidl in its trademark dispute with Tesco, but we should pay more attention to how we rule on first-instance decisions
Richard Kempner, partner at Haseltine Lake Kempner, discusses the ‘remarkable’ comments from judges, despite the court finding against his client Tesco on the bulk of issues
Gift this article