Be prepared to commit to pro bono cases
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Be prepared to commit to pro bono cases

“Blackhorse is in many ways the mother of all pro bono cases,” Wilson Brown of Drinker Biddle & Reath declared in yesterday’s session, Taking the Ball and Running with a Pro Bono Case Like the Redskins Trademark Cancellation Action.

The case has shown that law firms have to be prepared to take on pro bono cases for the long haul. Drinker first got involved in the issue being contested in the Blackhorse case in 1992.

“The reality is that once you are in for a penny, you are in for a pound,” said Brown. “That has proved to be the case with Blackhorse.”

In 1992 Drinker took on a pro bono case on behalf of Suzan Harjo, a Native American who filed a petition before the TTAB challenging the trademark registrations of NFL team Washington Redskins. The TTAB ruled in favor of Harjo in 1999, only for a district court to grant summary judgment to Pro Football in 2002. A Washington, D.C. court affirmed this on the basis of laches.

In 2006, Amanda Blackhorse and other younger Native Americans initiated a complaint. In June last year, this led to the TTAB cancelling six trademark registrations of the Redskins. Pro Football filed a civil action naming Blackhorse as a defendant. Summary judgment in the case is set for June and a trial set for July.

Brown said that Drinker has a written policy about whether to take on pro bono cases or not.

“Pro bono cases are those that we can take for those that are indigent or unable to afford it,” he said. “There are not too many hard calls. The Harjo and Blackhorse ones show some of the interesting aspects of our policy. These people were not able to afford the services. So it was easy to say, ‘If we are going to do it, then we have to do it pro bono.’”

The law firm takes into account the significance to the community at large.

“The firm will not refuse to assist public interest matters because they are controversial,” said Brown. “They are not subject to an ideological screen. So we could find ourselves on two sides of an issue in two different pro bono cases.”

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Tennessee has passed the ELVIS Act, a law that fights against AI models that mimic the voice and likeness of music artists
Rob Stien, chief communications and public policy officer at InterDigital, says the EU has forgotten innovators while trying to solve an issue that doesn’t exist
As Australia’s Qantm IP leans towards being acquired by a private equity company, sources discuss what it could mean for IP firms
Law firms that are conscious of their role in society are more likely to win work, according to a survey of over 23,000 in-house professionals
Nghiem Xuan Bac Pham, managing partner of Vision & Associates, discusses opportunities created by the US-China rift as well as profitability issues facing IP practices
Douglas Leite and two of his colleagues were intrigued by Bhering Advogados’s mission to grow its patent litigation practice
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP practitioner about their life and career
Counsel explain how pricing flexibility, patent agents and being business partners can help them maintain profitable patent prosecution practices
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Gift this article