Split CAFC changes inequitable conduct standard
In a six-judge majority opinion, the Federal Circuit today decided Therasense v Becton-Dickson, which has changed the standard for proving inequitable conduct in patent litigation
The ruling rejected the USPTO’s Rule 56, which states that information considered material to patentability extends to “any information that ‘refutes or is inconsistent with’ any position the applicant took regarding patentability”.
The court dubbed that rule “overly broad”...
Please log in
to read the rest of this article. New to Managing Intellectual Property?
Take advantage of free access to up to 5 articles on Managing IP and become a member today. It’s free to join and the benefits start straight away.
Please make sure you log in to read the rest of the article.
Join us nowGain FREE access to up to five free articles when you register now.