InternationalUSRemember you can easily switch between MIP US and MIP International at any time

WORLD IP SURVEY 2010

Chile

Patent

PATENT PROSECUTION
Tier 1
Sargent & Krahn
Tier 2
Estudio Federico Villaseca
Harnecker Carey
Johansson & Langlois
Silva & Cia
Tier 3
Alessandri & Compañia
Beuchat Barros & Pfenniger
Porzio Rios & Asociados
Tier 4
Claro y Cia

PATENT CONTENTIOUS
Tier 1
Sargent & Krahn
Tier 2
Estudio Federico Villaseca
Harnecker Carey
Johansson & Langlois
Porzio Rios & Asociados
Tier 3
Albagli Zaliasnik Abogados
Alessandri & Compañia
Claro y Cia

Trade mark

TRADE MARK PROSECUTION
Tier 1
Sargent & Krahn
Tier 2
Alessandri & Compañia
Estudio Federico Villaseca
Harnecker Carey
Silva & Cia
Tier 3
Beuchat Barros & Pfenniger
Johansson & Langlois
Porzio Rios & Asociados
Tier 4
Albagli Zaliasnik Abogados
Clarke Modet & Co
Claro y Cia
Cooper & Cia
Morales & Besa

TRADE MARK CONTENTIOUS
Tier 1
Sargent & Krahn
Tier 2
Alessandri & Compañia
Claro y Cia
Estudio Federico Villaseca
Harnecker Carey
Johansson & Langlois
Porzio Rios & Asociados
Tier 3
Albagli Zaliasnik Abogados
Cooper & Cia

More from the Managing IP blog


null null null

null null null

null

September / October 2019

Should I stay or should I go? Private practice v in-house

In-house or private practice? It’s a question many lawyers and attorneys will probably ask themselves at some stage in their career. Max Walters speaks to those on either side of the fence about the benefits and drawbacks of both



Most read articles

Supplements