The curious case of India's working of patents and Form 27 statements – a critique
Patentees in India are required to submit information about the working of patents, and even face prison if it is false. Jyoti Sagar and Deepa Kachroo Tiku argue Form 27 is unnecessary
Section 146(1) of the Indian Patent Act empowers the Controller to direct any patentee or licensee to furnish a statement describing the extent of the commercial working of the concerned patent in India. Section 146(2) takes it one step...
Please log in
to read the rest of this article. New to Managing Intellectual Property?
Take advantage of free access to up to 5 articles on Managing IP and become a member today. It’s free to join and the benefits start straight away.
Please make sure you log in to read the rest of the article.
Join us nowGain FREE access to up to five free articles when you register now.