Africa: Trade mark and copyright developments in Africa
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Africa: Trade mark and copyright developments in Africa

In Nigeria there were two important trade mark judgments, both of which went in favour of foreign companies. In the case of Piaggio & CSPA v Autobahn Techniques and the Registrar of Trademarks (Federal High Court, Lagos, November 30 2017) the court made it clear that a Nigerian distributor cannot take the trade mark of its foreign principal. The judge sent this warning to Nigerian distributors: extensive promotion does not amount to 'acquisition of proprietorship and goodwill.'

The case of Toyota Motor Corporation v Subaya Metalware Nigeria and Registrar of Trademarks(Court of Appeal, Lagos, December 29 2017) is unusual. In this, the appeal court held that the mere filing of a trade mark application cannot be interpreted as use of a trade mark and, by extension, infringement of another registration. The court also came to the finding that car stereos are car parts and therefore fall in class 12 rather than class 9. This meant that certain class 9 registrations for trade marks incorporating the word Lexus were not infringed simply because the Lexus car has a detachable car stereo marked Lexus Premium System.

In South Africa, an interesting decision was made in The Philanthropic Collection (Pty) v Girls & Boys South Africa (Gauteng High Court, February 15 2017). This case dealt with copyright in databases. The judgment examines what level of contribution is necessary before a party can be considered a joint owner of copyright. The judge held that creating a single form that led to information being added to an existing database did not constitute the 'skill, judgment or labour' required to confer joint ownership.

The authorities in Malawi have published the Trademarks Bill 2017. When this bill becomes law the outdated goods only/Part A and Part B registration system will be replaced with a modern one that allows for the registration of 'non-visual signs' and trade marks used for services. There will also be protection for well-known marks, an infringement right that extends beyond the actual goods/services covered by the registration and 10 year registration/renewal terms. The bill anticipates Malawi signing the Madrid Protocol and seemingly puts an end to doubts about the validity of ARIPO registrations in Malawi.

Duncan Maguire

Chris Walters


Spoor & Fisher JerseyAfrica House, Castle StreetSt Helier, Jersey JE4 9TWChannel IslandsTel: +44 1534 838000Fax: +44 1534 838001info@spoor.co.ukwww.spoor.com

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Counsel reveal how a proposal to create separate briefings for discretionary denials at the USPTO could affect their PTAB strategies
The UK Supreme Court rejected the firm’s appeal against an earlier ruling because it did not raise an arguable point of law
Loes van den Winkel, attorney at Arnold & Siedsma, explains why clients' enthusiasm is contagious and why her job does not mean managing fashion models
Allen & Gledhill partner Jia Yi Toh shares her experience of representing the winning team in the first-ever case filed under Singapore’s new fast-track IP dispute resolution system
In-house lawyers reveal how they balance cost, quality, and other criteria to get the most from their relationships with external counsel
Dario Pietrantonio of Robic discusses growth opportunities for the firm and shares insights from his journey to managing director
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Law firms that pay close attention to their client relationships are more likely to win repeat work, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
The EMEA research period is open until May 31
Practitioners analyse a survey on how law firms prove value to their clients and reflect on why the concept can be hard to pin down
Gift this article