Austria: Earth Wind & Fire trade mark dispute
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Austria: Earth Wind & Fire trade mark dispute

Earth Wind & Fire is the name of a music band founded in 1965 by the drummer Maurice White. Since 1975 that formation has celebrated worldwide successes and earned Grammies and gold- and platinum albums. The band became famous also in Austria and was famous at the time of priority (2003) of the attacked trade mark. It was from 1977 onwards in the Austrian charts, also at the time of priority. This was so irrespective of whether Maurice White played with his band at that time.

Al McKay joined that formation as guitarist later in 1973 and left it in 1981. He formed a band The Earth Wind & Fire Experience featuring the Al McKay all stars, whose name was registered as a trade mark in Austria with priority of 2003. This band made hundreds of concerts worldwide and also in Austria between 2004 and 2007. But in the media and its advertisements this formation was named Earth Wind & Fire without any additions. The defendant purported that it had registered this name as a trade mark to fight off tribute bands. It added the other words in order to differentiate itself from the original band and to emphasise that the key role is played by Al McKay with his experience in the original band.

Maurice White sued on different grounds, among them bad faith. The courts confirmed that the registration was made in bad faith. As a basis it was confirmed that Earth Wind & Fire is and was a famous trade mark in Austria and that the defendant had known this fact when filing its mark. Whether Al McKay might be himself famous is of no interest to this case. The fact that Al McKay was a member of the original formation does not justify an infringement in the rights of Maurice White with the aim to profit from its fame. It has apparently accepted a confusion with the famous mark.

Confusion is given when the earlier mark is fully contained in the latter mark as a separate entity. The services protected are anyway identical. Bad faith – the aim to profit from the fame of the earlier mark – need not to be the only reason for adopting the younger mark. There may exist other reasons besides it such as fighting off other pirates or protection of one's own interests. But that does not mitigate the abuse done by bad faith.

sonn.jpg

Helmut Sonn


SONN & PARTNER PatentanwälteRiemergasse 14A-1010 Vienna, AustriaTel: +43 1 512 84 05Fax: +43 1 512 98 05office@sonn.atwww.sonn.at

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The former head of life sciences at Kramer Levin has joined Orrick, a firm that hopes to grow in the sector
Lionel Martin of August Debouzy and Kristof Neefs at Inteo share how they prevailed in a UPC Court of Appeal case surrounding access to documents
Counsel say ‘strange’ results have increased their reliance on subscription-based search platforms, but costs are not being shifted onto clients yet
The firm was among multiple winners at a record-breaking 2024 ceremony held in London on April 11
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The Americas research cycle has commenced. Do not miss this opportunity to nominate your work!
Increased and new patent fees could affect prosecution strategies for law firms and companies, according to sources
Five former Oblon lawyers felt that joining Merchant & Gould would help them offer the right prices to entice clients
The UK may not be a UPC member but its firms are still acting in proceedings, with Carpmaels among the most prominent
Naomi Pearce of Pearce IP shares how she is helping her firm become a life sciences leader and how generous policies have helped attract top talent
Gift this article