InternationalUSRemember you can easily switch between MIP US and MIP International at any time

The number one issue for IP owners

James Nurton

What is the biggest challenge for IP owners entering emerging markets? This was one of the questions addressed by the UK’s IP attachés, who were visiting London recently from their bases in Brazil, China, Singapore and Switzerland

IPAN panelTheir two roles are to provide practical support to UK companies, particularly SMEs, entering new markets, and to work with host nation governments on improvements to laws and enforcement. France and the United States have similar networks of representatives.

Speaking at an event hosted by IPAN at CIPA last month (right), the UK attachés noted that they have worked with 233 individual companies, who have IP rights estimated at £377 million ($600 million).

They also spoke about some of the specific issues they have been working on. So what, I wondered is the single biggest challenge for UK rights owners in these markets? Is it counterfeiting? Copyright piracy? Problems with patentability? Cybersquatting? Compulsory licensing? The expense and time of litigation? The difficulty of finding local lawyers?

It turns out it’s more mundane. About 40% of the issues the attaches work on concern trade marks. And based on their presentations and from speaking to them afterwards, it seems like the single biggest headache is bad faith applications. As the UK attaché in Beijing Tom Duke said, one of the main unanswered questions about the revisions to China’s Trade Mark Law is: “How will they deal with the systemic problem of bad faith applications?”

Wait Rose Chennai

Some of these experiences might be unique to British institutions – both Buckingham Palace and the Royal Mint have had to take action in India – but others are typical for owners of well-known brands. One example given (also from India) was the Wait Rose supermarket set up in Chennai - the two words separated by a picture of a rose (see photo).

In some ways it seems ridiculous that more than 130 years after the Paris Convention was signed, and despite the popularity of systems such as the Madrid Protocol, trade mark owners are bedevilled by chancers exploiting their hard-earned goodwill to confuse consumers.

On the other hand, perhaps it’s an unavoidable effect of the flattening of the world. Some people might also say trade mark owners only have themselves to blame if they don’t take steps to register their rights promptly.

We’d be interested to know what readers think. Are bad faith applications a nuisance, or something worse? And can anything realistically be done to tackle them?

For more information on the UK IP attachés, read the independent report on their work so far.


Article Comments

I believe Bad faith application(s) is only symptom, but the actual issue continues to be following:
a. Lack of awareness / education about trademark rights.
b. Lack of Reciprocation from the host market.
c. Enforcement issues.
d. Resulting in loss of business and possible dilution of mark.

Addressing the issue of 'bad faith applications' equals to addressing only a symptom rather addressing actual issue.


RP Nov 13, 2014

Popular Posts

Blog Archive

IP-related blogs

1709 Copyright Blog


AIA blog

Art and Artifice

China IPR

Class 99

Domain Incite

FOSS Patents

Green Patent Blog


IP CloseUp

IP Dragon

IP finance

IP Kat

IP Komodo

IP tango

IP Watchdog


MARQUES Class 46

Orange Book Blog

Patent Baristas



SPC Blog

Spicy IP

The Trademark Blog

The TTABlog