Disparaging and scandalous trade marks post-Tam
While the Supreme Court settled the issue of disparaging marks, Section 2(a)’s prohibition against immoral or scandalous marks is still being contested. The Federal Circuit last month declined to hear the Brunetti case en banc
The biggest US trademark decision of the past year was Matal v Tam, in which the Supreme Court in June 2017 found that Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act’s prohibition on the registration of disparaging marks violated the First Amendment....
Please log in
to read the rest of this article. New to Managing Intellectual Property?
Take advantage of free access to up to 5 articles on Managing IP and become a member today. It’s free to join and the benefits start straight away.
Please make sure you log in to read the rest of the article.
Join us nowGain FREE access to up to five free articles when you register now.