The Netherlands: Ascertaining inventive step in a dosage of tadalafil
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

The Netherlands: Ascertaining inventive step in a dosage of tadalafil

Cialis® is a pharmaceutical product for the treatment of erectile dysfunction developed by Lilly ICOS, a joint venture of ICOS Corporation and Eli Lilly and Company. The active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) of Cialis®, tadalafil, inhibits the PDE5 enzyme, just like sildenafil in the better-known Viagra®.

Recently, the District Court of The Hague had to decide whether a pharmaceutical unit dosage composition for a maximum daily dosage of 5mg of tadalafil for the treatment of a sexual dysfunction, as claimed in ICOS's patent EP1173181, involves an inventive step. Teva Pharmaceuticals Europe, claiming invalidity of the patent before the court, argued that this dosage composition is obvious in view of an earlier patent publication by ICOS (WO 97/03675).

Contrary to ICOS's submissions, by disclosing the use of tadalafil for sexual dysfunction, this earlier document incentivises the skilled person to develop a second in class drug for this indication and the skilled person would accordingly start clinical trials. As such, the court reasoned that the case comes down to the question of which dosages would be tested in a phase IIb clinical trial and whether 5mg would be part of this trial.

Following this reasoning, the court judged that the skilled person could then walk down two one-way streets, which would both inevitably lead to the dosage unit composition of 5 mg. Going down a first street, the skilled person would find pharmaceutical data in phase I clinical trial studies which would, together with known efficacy data for sildenafil in Viagra®, enable him to make the calculated estimation that a 5mg daily dosage should be included in phase IIb clinical trial tests. The court then further argued that, even if the skilled person would not take this street, but instead would turn into phase IIb clinical trial studies with daily dosages of 25, 50 and 100 mg, the skilled person would have found a constant efficacy of tadalafil at these dosages and would accordingly have lowered the dosage to reduce side effects. As such, either street would lead the skilled person to an effective daily dosage of 5mg with minimal side effects.

Therefore, in the court's decision, all roads obviously lead to Cialis®.

Henri van Kalkeren


V.O.Carnegieplein 5, 2517 KJThe HagueThe NetherlandsTel: +31 70 416 67 11Fax: +31 70 416 67 99info@vo.euwww.vo.eu

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The winner of Managing IP’s Life Achievement Award discusses 50 years in IP law and how even he can’t avoid imposter syndrome
Saya Choudhary of Singh & Singh explains how her team navigated nine years of litigation to secure record damages of $29 million and the lessons learned along the way
The full list of finalists has been revealed and the winners will be presented on June 20 at the Metropolitan Club in New York
A team of IP and media law specialists has joined from SKW Schwarz alongside a former counsel at Sky
The Irish government has delayed a planned referendum on whether Ireland should join the Unified Patent Court, prompting concern about when a vote may take place
With more than 250 winners recognised during the ceremony, there are many reasons to be positive about the health of the IP industry in EMEA
Practitioners say the USPTO’s latest guidance has some helpful clarifications and is a good reminder of the importance of checking AI outputs
Susanne Schmidt discusses why trademarks are more than 'just a name' and why she would choose green farming as an alternative career
The former head of life sciences at Kramer Levin has joined Orrick, a firm that hopes to grow in the sector
Lionel Martin of August Debouzy and Kristof Neefs at Inteo share how they prevailed in a UPC Court of Appeal case surrounding access to documents
Gift this article