EU trade mark owners can enforce against other TM holders
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EU trade mark owners can enforce against other TM holders

An opinion issued by Advocate General Mengozzi of the Court of Justice of the EU today says that holders of Community trade marks (CTMs) should be able to enforce their right against other, allegedly infringing, parties, even if those parties hold a later CTM

dog1.png

The question was referred to the CJEU from a Spanish court in Alicante. It was dealing with an action for infringement brought by an international dog-breeding company FCI, against a local dog association, FCIPPR. The latter had national word marks for FCI and the former a CTM for an FCI logo.

However, due to FCI’s failure to pay its opposition fees in time, FCIPPR had also managed to register a logo CTM that was very similar to FCI’s. FCI had since initiated an invalidity proceeding against that mark at OHIM, as well as the Spanish action.

dog2.png

The court in Alicante asked whether a CTM holder’s rights to prevent third parties from using confusingly similar marks extended to those who had later CTMs, or whether they were excluded until that later mark had been declared invalid.

Mengozzi said that yes, the CTM right included this and the infringement action could go ahead. The opinion included discussion of the definition of a “third party” under the CTM regulation. That and the relationship between infringement and invalidity actions is apparently “a matter of lively debate among Spanish legal commentators and in Spanish case-law”. Mengozzi also noted that this topic had been brought up before – though in Germany in 1906.

The opinion is not binding on the Court of Justice, though opinions are usually broadly followed.

The opinion can be seen here.



more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A 36-member team from Zhong Lun Law Firm, including six partners, will join the newly formed East IP Group
The Delhi High Court sided with Ericsson against Indian smartphone maker Lava, bringing the companies' nine-year dispute to a close
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Tennessee has passed the ELVIS Act, a law that fights against AI models that mimic the voice and likeness of music artists
Rob Stien, chief communications and public policy officer at InterDigital, says the EU has forgotten innovators while trying to solve an issue that doesn’t exist
As Australia’s Qantm IP leans towards being acquired by a private equity company, sources discuss what it could mean for IP firms
Law firms that are conscious of their role in society are more likely to win work, according to a survey of over 23,000 in-house professionals
Nghiem Xuan Bac Pham, managing partner of Vision & Associates, discusses opportunities created by the US-China rift as well as profitability issues facing IP practices
Douglas Leite and two of his colleagues were intrigued by Bhering Advogados’s mission to grow its patent litigation practice
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP practitioner about their life and career
Gift this article