Rejected petition cites failure to apply KSR
The US Supreme Court has decided not to hear a dispute between Capital Machine and Miller Veneers, two Indianapolis-based veneer companies, in which the Federal Circuit failed to apply KSR v Teleflex in its judgment in an interference matter
Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt lawyers Rob Nissen and Charles Gholz, who represented Miller Veneers, argued in their petition that the Federal Circuit failed to properly apply the Supreme Courts formulation of obviousness laid down in KSR.
Please log in
to read the rest of this article. New to Managing Intellectual Property?
Take advantage of free access to up to 5 articles on Managing IP and become a member today. It’s free to join and the benefits start straight away.
Please make sure you log in to read the rest of the article.
Join us nowGain FREE access to up to five free articles when you register now.